Thursday, October 27, 2016

American Flag

by -

Just when you thought leftist intolerance of anything patriotic or pro-American could get any worse, it does – this time in Ohio where state lawmakers find it necessary to take up legislation that recognizes the right of citizens to fly the American flag on their own homes – even if they are renters.

The legislation known as House Bill 18 will amend state law and reads in part that:

“…manufactured homes park operators, condominium associations, neighborhood associations, and landlords (shall not restrict) the display of blue star banners, gold star banners, other service flags, and the POW/MIA flag, and to prohibit manufactured homes park operators and landlords from restricting the display of the United States flag.”

In other words, the legislation would prohibit landlords from banning any type of American flag, including ones related to the military and government, from being flown by people where they live.

This legislation came about after an 86-year-old woman, Julia Lease, was told by her landlord that she could not fly the American flag on the front porch of her rented home.

Mrs. Lease received the command to remove the American flag in a note left at her house by her landlord. When she said “Not on your life,” her story began to go viral across the country. The landlord and his company tried to defend their actions by saying they were:

“…not against American flags, nor do they have any policy against American flags.” “Ultimately, the issue is that if you allow a display of something – from our point of view, from a fair-housing perspective – you’d have to allow a display of anything.”

This rental company said their “neutral” policy was adopted so other people would not be offended by people who may want to fly the flags of other nations according to Breitbart News. After the debate began to heat up beyond all expectations, the landlord caved and let the woman keep flying the flag. Lease said:

“It means to me that I live in a country worth fighting for…” “It belongs up.”

The Conservative Tribute reports that “stories like Lease’s have become all too common, and though it is great news that at least one state is taking legal action to ensure their citizens patriotic rights, the fact that such a law is needed in the land of the free shows the sad state to which our society has fallen. Ohio Representative Niraj Antani told WBNS:

“We must protect our First Amendment rights and this bill does exactly that,”. “Patriotic Americans should be able to display flags on their homes and I am proud to have voted for this bill.”

by -

The Associated Students of University of California, Irvine (ASUCI), the student government organization at the university voted in early March to remove the American flag from the organization’s lobby saying the flag was a “symbol of patriotism or weapons of nationalism.”

The vote was 6-4 with two abstentions.

Using language borrowed from state legislatures or Congress, the Student Government passed “bill” number R50-70 banning the American Flag for the following reasons: Whereas,

“[F]lags construct paradigms of conformity and sets [sic] homogenized standards for others to obtain which in this country typically are idolized as freedom, equality, and democracy.”

“[T]he American flag has been flown in instances of colonialism and imperialism,” the bill continues, arguing that “symbolism has negative and positive aspects that are interpreted differently by individuals.”

“[F]reedom of speech, in a space that aims to be as inclusive as possible[,] can be interpreted as hate speech…”

Supporters of the bill said that that the (American) flag may be interpreted as a symbol of “American exceptionality and superiority” or “oppression.” As such, the flag could be interpreted as hate speech. The language of the legislation concludes with three resolutions:

  •  “Let it be resolved that ASUCI make every effort to make the Associated Students main lobby space as inclusive as possible.”
  •  “Let it further be resolved that no flag, of any nation, may be hanged on the walls of the Associate Student main lobby space.”
  •  “Let it be further be resolved that if a decorative item is in the Associate student lobby space and issues arise, the solution will be to remove the item if there is considerable request to do so.”

ASUCI President Reza Zomorrodian spoke against the bill saying:

I stand firmly against this piece of legislation, though I understand the authors intent, I disagree with the solution Council has come to”…“As Chair of the Executive Cabinet we will be having a conversation about this piece of legislation and deciding what course of action the cabinet will take collectively.”

Two days later, the ASUSI Executive Cabinet convened to veto ASUCI Legislative Council legislation R50-70 saying that “Flags and decoration adjustment for inclusivity”. We engage in this action to veto under the constitutional authority granted to us under (the) ASUCI Constitution stating:

“Vetoing, as seen fit, any measures adopted by the Legislative Council, provided such an action be exercised only once per measure, and within six (6) days from the date of the measure being passed, after which time, the measure shall become legislation with or without the Executive Cabinet’s approval.”

We fundamentally disagree with the actions taken by ASUCI Legislative Council and their passage of R50-70 as counter to the ideals that allow us to operate as an autonomous student government organization with the freedoms of speech and expression associated with it.

It is these very symbols that represent our constitutional rights that have allowed for our representative creation and our ability to openly debate all ranges of issues and pay tribute to how those liberties were attained.

For the moment, reason among student leaders attending the University of California, Irvine has prevailed.



When Comey, the director of the FBI decided not to charge Hillary Clinton, it looks like it had more to do with money than...