Thursday, March 30, 2017


by -

“Keep Austin Weird” is a mantra that is being taken very seriously on the campus of University of Texas at Austin. A cry of “Cocks Not Glocks” has swept the student population by storm. The protest stems from the campus loosening restrictions on concealed carry under the implications that it will help in the instances of a live shooter if students can defend themselves easier. Students participating in the anti-carry protest are countering by carrying sex toys to class.

Jessice Jin who set up the “Campus (DILDO) Carry” event says in the group’s description,

“You’re carrying a gun to class? Yeah well I’m carrying a HUGE DILDO,”

Over four thousand people have already committed via Facebook to attend the group protest, scheduled for the first day of the 2016 fall semester.

Jin contests that the swinging phalluses will illustrate the, she contends, ludicrous nature of the concealed carry policy. Proponents of the dildo “strap in” believe that students who would take action in case of a live shooter would add to any confusion and create more dangerous situation.

The campus carry law was signed into effect in June by Governor Greg Abbott. The law makes provision for properly-licensed firearm owners to carry concealed weapons into most campus buildings. “Gun-free zones” can be designated by campus presidents. The law begins August 2016.

The changes to concealed carry regulations have caused an expected stir. One professor has already said that he will leave teaching over it, citing concerns for his personal safety.
Campus carry will not affect community college campuses until 2017 and will not apply to private schools whatsoever.

Jin is calling for widespread protest from those outside the school and state of Texas as well. She is encouraging any with concerns to open carry a dildo.

Angry college students and left wing anti-gunners may inadvertently increase the value of sex toy stocks. Maybe it’s time to invest.

by -

To support illegal immigrants in a lawsuit against the government, a police chief in a major U.S. city has signed a sworn declaration endorsing an easily forged Mexican identification card known as “Matricula Consular” as a valid form of ID.

As incredulous as this may seem it’s a real case coming out of Austin, the capital of Texas and the nation’s 13th most populous city. Austin Police Chief Art Acevedo has actually provided a federal court with a signed affidavit declaring that the Mexican ID cards, which are not accepted by the government because they’re not secure and are extremely susceptible to fraud, are indeed a valid form of identification in the United States. Some might ask what the good chief, an officer who has sworn to uphold the law, smoked before submitting such an outlandish statement to a U.S. court.

Chief Acevedo filed the legal document to help out a group of illegal immigrants who delivered anchor babies in Texas and earlier this year sued the state for denying them birth certificates because they failed to provide proper identification. The women claim in their federal court lawsuit that the Texas Department of State Health Services illegally interfered with the federal government’s authority over immigration and committed constitutional discrimination when it refused to issue birth certificates for their babies. “By denying the Plaintiff children their birth certificates, Defendants have created a category of second-class citizens, disadvantaged from childhood on with respect to health and educational opportunities,” the lawsuit reads. “Defendants are acting beyond the scope of their authority in denying birth certificates on the basis of the parents’ immigration status.”

The state agency was simply abiding by the law in not accepting a Mexican ID because it does not meet government standards in this country. In congressional testimony a few years after 9/11 the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) revealed that, after extensive research, the U.S. government determined the Matricula Consular is not a reliable form of identification “due to the non-existence of any means of verifying the true identity of the card holder.” This allows criminals to fraudulently obtain the cards, the FBI told Congress, because Mexico only requires “documents of very low reliability.” As a result the cards pose criminal and terrorist threats in the U.S., including opportunities for terrorists to move freely within the country without triggering name-based watch lists that are disseminated to local police.

None of this seems to matter to Chief Acevedo, who insists the Mexican cards are a valid form of identification in the United States. A local newspaper quotes him saying “I have yet to know of any occasion where this card has been compromised or this card has been a problem for our police department,” the chief said. “We’ve accepted it for many years now, and it’s a great way of identification.” He indicated that he filed the court document supporting the illegal immigrant mothers to build trust. “What people forget in this country is that the eyes and ears of law enforcement are the community,” Acevedo said. “When my immigrant community trusts this police department, when they trust the police chief, the officers, they come forward to stand for their neighbor.” Then the police chief of the nation’s 13th most populous city proceeded to say something incredibly alarming: “What I love about this card is that it is a guarantee from the Mexican government that the bearer of the card is the person who is identified.”

Judicial Watch has reported extensively on the controversy surrounding the Matricula Consular, including attempts by liberal lawmakers to pass legislation that would put the cards in the same class as a U.S. government-issued identification. JW has also reported that, despite their serious security flaws, the Mexican IDs are a widely accepted form of identification to open accounts at banks across the nation, including major financial institutions.

by -

Can you even have Texas with barbecue?

Earlier this month, Austin City Council members debated a plan that would put restrictions on smoke coming out of barbecue restaurants. While a final vote isn’t expected until the summer, council members gave preliminary approval

Councilman Pio Renteria is spearheading the project–arguing that his constituents have complained to him that smoke coming from barbecue joints prevents them from opening windows or spending time in their backyards.

Bruce Hughes, who lives near the La Barbecue trailer in East Austin, complained: “They smoke several days a week, generally five days a week for 17 hours. I can no longer open windows, the smoke seeps in from the attic.”

Under the new law, Austin would regulate the amount of smoke that comes from food trucks and restaurants if they’re within 100 feet of a residential area.

Of course, barbecue restaurant owners aren’t too pleased.

“My concern is that if we have an ordinance that paints all of us into one group of folk that may not be good neighbors,” said Hoover Alexander, who’s a board member with the Greater Austin Restaurant Association. “We’re going to be penalized without considerations of other solutions.”

Austin–which has long been a deep blue pocket of Texas–is another example of liberal government gone crazy with regulating ever little thing.

When the Left starts banning barbecue smoke in Texas, you know things are out of control.


The U.S. Army had to pay to get a high-ranking transgender Pentagon official to appear at its military academy on Transgender Day of Remembrance,...