Thursday, December 8, 2016


by -
Women fighting

Two women fight in a California parking lot, but things get crazy when they get in their cars. See the shocking video.

The fight happened in South Los Angeles and according to reports, the brawl started over an argument about a parking spot.

The LAPD are investigating the fight that went from two women in a parking lot throwing fists to two women ramming each other’s cars.

Several videos have surfaced of the incredible altercation and here is one that catches the whole scene.

Watch until the end to see the wet mess they leave behind.

Luckily nobody was seriously hurt. It is obvious from the videos that several people were walking around the parking lot as the two women drove into each other.

The scene ended with the white SUV driving over a fire hydrant and spewing water high into the air like a scene from a movie.

Los Angeles Department of Water and Power came out and fixed the hydrant. Hopefully the police can identify the two women and send them the bill for the fire hydrant so the people of South Los Angeles don’t have to pay for stupidity of the two in the video.

Both cars and all suspects fled the scene before the police arrived. Police say they have opened an investigation after the video surfaced. No reports on the identity of the drivers or what charges will be filed when the pair are arrested.

I’m no police officer, but I would just call the BMW dealership and ask them to call back when they get a BMW SUV with a broken passenger door in for repair. From the video, that door and the poor fire hydrant got the worst of it.

When the police identify the women in the videos, what do you think should happen to them? Let us know in the comments below.

by -

Watch as people sign the petition to put Sasquatch, or the man/animal better known as Big Foot, on the California endangered list.

Mark Dice is known for exposing the ignorance of Americans in hilarious fashion and this video is no different.

Watch as Mark films person after person signing the petition to put Big Foot on the endangered species list in California.

The guy at the end gives us hope as Americans. At least there are still some people who pay attention.

Mark Dice has asked people to sign petitions to repeal the Bill of Rights, support Sharia Law and even to end women’s suffrage.

In one of his more daring videos to show how ignorant and suspicious people are in general, Mark Dice offered ten different people a chance to take a 100-ounce bar of silver or a Hersey’s chocolate bar. Trick or treat.

Guess how many selected the silver?

Mark Dice’s channel is definitely worth subscribing to.

Ironically, the YouTube sensation films all his video in the heart of California. The same state that wants to become its own country, because it didn’t like the election results.

They wanted to elect Hillary Clinton, a lady that only 15% of Americans think is honest and trustworthy. Is it a coincidence that about 15% of Americans believe in Big Foot? I think not.

Would you want to make sure Big Foot is added to the Endangered Species List?

Let us know in the comments below.

by -

Californians cried together after the divisive Trump train steamrolled through our hope for a future without hate. What choice do we have but to leave the USA?

What kind of nation have we become when we let a person who said the worst things about all kinds of people become our leader?

Don’t we have are right to challenge the man you call president?

We don’t feel that way over her on the left coast. We know that love Trump’s hate, but that didn’t happen on Election Day.

Somehow America voted against “the most qualified person to ever run for president”. (Not my words, but president Obama’s.) How sexist are we as a nation.

After the KKK endorsed Donald Trump, people still supported “billionaire”. His supporters have at least one thing in common with the KKK, but I am proud to say that I have nothing in common with them except the color of my skin. I don’t even want them in my country.

He said that he would ban all Muslims from entering this country, yet people supported him. Millions of people.

I could go on and on about what Trump said and who he insulted, but that doesn’t matter now. He is the president and we don’t want to take it. We don’t accept it. Trump is not my president.

I have friends who are here “illegally” and I don’t want to see them or their families deported. What choice do we have but to leave America? We don’t have a choice.

This week, the legal process has started for California to leave the United States and become our own country. We have everything we need right here. We have the best wines, beaches, tacos and even marijuana. We don’t need to associate with people that vote for hate. We voted for love. Love trumps hate.

We could have had the first ever-female president, but instead we got Donald freaking Trump. Of all people, your America voted for Donald Trump.

Here in California, we like our culturally diverse friends and our freedoms to marry anyone we choose, even if that is a Muslim from Syria. Trump cannot stop us; after all he is not our president.

Come to California and help us leave the United States. There might some speed bumps in the process, but even if we don’t have everything figured out yet, at least we’re not racist.

Do you support California leaving the United States? Let me know in the comments below.

by -

California is a bastion for liberalism, but some voted in a dead man and claim they can be trusted with their own country.

In Oceanside City near San Diego, a county elected a dead man as Treasurer. 17,000 people voted for a guy that died in September. The dead man beat his competitor by three thousand votes.

These are the same people that think Trump is Hitler and want to secede from the nation. They want to start their own country.

In a movement that is called the #CalExit, a very large number of people in California don’t want to be American anymore.

To explain this crazy idea, it is best to let Mark Dice break it down.

This is laughable, but the movement is gaining some ground and even some businesses are saying they will help fund the project.

Strangely, the people who claim to be the most tolerant and open-minded people are the ones that want to remove themselves from any thought they disagree with. This is especially true in the “tech valley” of California. Watch one “tech giant” go nuts over a Trump win.

People are angry that Trump won, but not because they think he is racist, but because the safe-space PC culture that liberals use to make themselves seem important and justify their laziness and hatred is going away. It’s time for them to man up and help make America better, not just their little sliver of the country.

How would you feel if California became it’s own country? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
gun show

Federal law enforcement is working with local law enforcement to monitor gun show attendees with controversial techniques.

In 2010 the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency devised a plan to record license-plate numbers of everyone at the gun shows in Southern California.

The license plates were recorded with special devices that can read and record all numbers of passing cars.

The agents then took the information collected at the gun show and looked for those cars crossing the southern border into Mexico.

Other than criminals, privacy advocates are furious at the new tactics.

Collecting information on all the people attending a gun show could be useful to law enforcement.

Stopping guns from crossing the border isn’t a bad thing, but government generally takes good programs and corrupts them.

Imagine a list of gun owners in the hands of the people that want to get rid of guns. If you start with a list of your enemies then you most likely have the advantage.

Looking at this from another angle, why are the police monitoring citizens in order to stop guns from going into Mexico? Shouldn’t they be worried about the guns coming into America?

So it comes down to this question…

Do you want your freedoms or do you want to feel a little bit safer? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

by -
gun control

Two years ago I wrote about an idiot politician publicly making a fool of himself at his own scripted press conference. The politician was California State Sen. Kevin de León, and his topic was “Ghost Guns.” The press conference was to publicize de León’s latest gun control bill, a proposal to require anyone making a gun in his or her garage to register it with the state Department of Justice and engrave a DOJ-supplied serial number on the gun. His primary justification for this proposal was that a mentally disturbed young man who had been denied purchase of a firearm had subsequently manufactured a firearm from purchased parts and fabricated components, and used that homemade gun to murder several people before committing suicide.

As disturbing and compelling as that story might be, de León’s “solution” was absolutely laughable. Could he possibly believe that his law would have prevented this tragedy? Is it remotely conceivable that this disturbed young man, having been turned down for a firearm purchase at a dealer based on his mental history, would have then requested permission from the DOJ to construct a gun from parts in his bedroom?

As idiotic as that idea is, de León’s manic performance at the press conference overshadowed any obvious flaws in his reasoning. Along with repeated mispronunciations and misapplication of words, de León consistently conflated “detectability” with “traceability” as he tried to demonize both homemade 3D-printed guns and homemade guns manufactured with more traditional machining methods. But the money shot came when de León explained the awesome firepower of one of his prop “Ghost Guns.” Holding up one of the guns, de León declared;

“This is a ghost gun. This right here has the ability, with a .30 caliber clip, to disperse with 30 bullets within half a second.” He then reiterated, to drive home the point, “Thirty magazine clip in half a second.”

The reason I bring up this 2-year-old news conference now is that Sen. de León, this stellar example of a politician whose only apparent noteworthy skill is that of being elected, is now, along with being one of the most rabid – if poorly informed – proponents of radical gun control, the president pro tempore of the Senate, the highest ranking and most powerful role in the California Legislature.

This is as irrational and inexplicable as the elevation of “Groping Joe” Biden to the office of vice president. At least Biden serves the security function of being a deterrent to anyone considering assassination of the president. Sen. de León doesn’t even have that going for him. What he does have is good looks and impeccable Spanish. He’s probably also really good at remembering names and asking for money, and he is an extreme radical on a variety of political topics. An avowed “liberal progressive” and Hillary Clinton supporter, de León is a champion of massive restrictions on carbon emissions, a tireless advocate for citizenship rights and benefits for immigrants illegally in the country, and a supporter of the environmental policies that mandated diverting millions of metric tons of water from reservoirs and farmers in favor of an ineffective effort to improve habitat for a subspecies of smelt, resulting in the current severe water shortage. He is also a vocal advocate of additional restrictions on tobacco smokers, additional rights for marijuana smokers and a strong proponent of raising the minimum wage to at least $15 an hour. That the people of California and their elected representatives would, during a time of economic struggle and budget challenges, when the state is effectively beyond broke, select such a radical destroyer to lead their Senate is beyond comprehension.

In May, de León helped to push through yet another round of gun control tightening in the state, on top of some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. Included in the package is a blanket ban on possession of any magazine capable of holding over 10 rounds. Unlike the current law, which forbids the sale of such magazines, this law criminalizes possession, requiring that all existing magazines of greater than 10-round capacity be sold, destroyed, or surrendered without compensation.

Tell me again that confiscation is not the eventual objective of gun control.

Another bill in the package passed by the Senate requires a background check and record-keeping for ammunition purchases. This is probably the most sinister in the group because it not only adds complication and expense to a protected constitutional right, but by retaining records of ammunition purchases it creates a de facto gun owner registration system. You can be sure that de León and his ilk would use this information to further harass gun owners.

The rest of the package includes de León’s “Ghost Gun” registration bill, a bill banning so-called “bullet button” magazine systems – effectively outlawing numerous currently legal rifles – a bill that makes the victim of a firearm theft a criminal if they fail to report the theft in what some bureaucrat considers a timely manner, a bill that makes simply loaning a gun to a friend or even a family member in most cases, a criminal offense, a technical correction that moves theft of a firearm back up to felony status, and a bill creating a Firearm Violence Research Center at the University of California.

The whole package is designed to compete with an even worse ballot initiative Lt. Gov. (and gubernatorial candidate) Gavin Newsom is championing. The gun control package is now in the hands of the State Assembly where even more gun control legislation is already pending.

We should probably be grateful to California’s gun control zealots for proving that control freaks are never satisfied. No matter how many laws they pass, they will always come back for more. We in the rest of the country need to recognize the warning and understand that gun control is back on the front burner as a political issue. We must mobilize to shut this nonsense down.

by -
bikini burglar

If you live in the Santa Clariata Valley area of Los Angeles California you need to watch out. There is a criminal on the loose.

A woman has stolen valuables from several houses has been seen on surveillance video to only be wearing a bikini.

The woman who looks to be in her 30’s broke into three houses and stole some valuables and walked out.

Crimes happen all the time, but not many criminals are wearing a bikini when they break in. This woman was.

There is no word on how the woman made off with the goods, since she obviously didn’t have any pockets to stash them in.

The footage shows her pulling out in a tan sedan, but that is hard to spot.

If you see a woman with a bikini who has a yellow bottom and a green top, robbing a home and stuffing jewelry in her bathing suit, call the police.

The police don’t think she is dangerous, although she was baring her arms.

Please be careful out there, it is a dangerous world.

by -

In a recent ruling by the Obama Administration, churches in California are being forced to pay for abortions through the Affordable Care Act.

Abortions are covered in Obamacare under “basic health services”, but the Obama Administration has ordered all insurance companies to pay for surgical abortions.

No church in California is safe.

In October 2015, a number of churches joined in a lawsuit against the ruling that has been moving though the courts.

The Department of Health and Human Services was investigating the matter and found that there was no violation, so they are closing the investigation. They will not look into this matter any further.

What does that mean? It means that the Obama administration is mandating churches to pay for abortions even though it is against their religious beliefs.

Pro-life leaders in congress are speaking out. Rep. Chris Smith, who is also the co-chair of the Bipartisan Congressional Pro-Life Caucus, had this to say after the ruling:

“Nearly two years after California imposed its draconian mandate that requires all insurance companies to pay for abortion the Obama Administration has reached a new low. This means that Californians, including churches, will continue to be forced to pay for elective abortions in their insurance plans.

Congress must not let this discrimination stand. We must take this issue out of the hands of the Obama Administration by moving enforcement of current conscience protections to the courts. Congress needs to enact legislation so churches and other victims have a “private right of action” so they can have their day in court.”

Currently a couple of large churches have joined together to ask the courts permission to sue the state of California.

This is far from over.

Right now, Obama is making Christian churches pay for abortions through tax dollars and it isn’t right. Stay tuned to Liberty News Now for more updates as this story develops.

What do you think? Should churches be forced to pay for abortions? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

by -

Today is the day. Despite the reports yesterday that Hillary has clinched the nomination of the Democratic Party, the announcement was premature.

She has enough delegates if you count all the super delegates, but she doesn’t have enough to win the nomination outright… yet.

Today could be the day that she really clinches the nomination with a big primary win in California. Bernie though could pull off a miraculous upset and win California.

Even if Bernie wins California, he will still be down in the delegate count and the big question will be, “what will Bernie do next”? Will he pull out of the race and support Hillary?

Will Bernie keep fighting all the way to the convention and divide the Democratic Party and roll out the red carpet for Trump?

If Bernie loses California today there is a great possibility that he will suspend his campaign only to return if Hillary goes to prison. (Which is a possibility.)

If Bernie wins though, there could be a big battle leading into the convention in August. Even if Bernie does not have enough delegates to win, he and his socialist policies will be front and center during the convention.

The challenge for the Democratic Party is to figure out a way to not completely disenfranchise his avid supporters and bring them into the fold somehow.

The longer this drags on, there is more and more of a reality that Bernie could end up the running mate of Hillary. If nothing else, it she may select him just to appease his supporters.

Regardless of what we speculate what will happen, it all comes down to California for Bernie Sanders. He needs to make his final stand and he is looking like he is in good shape.

Sanders has campaigned ferociously in the state for a couple of weeks and was down as much as 13% in the polls during the winter and is now leading the former secretary in some polls.

This is his last stand and he is giving it his all, but will it be enough? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
Email Scandal

The man who set up the private server for Hillary Clinton has had immunity by the Department of Justice for some time and has been working with the DOJ and FBI to answer their questions about Hillary’s email server.

In Court this week, Brian Pagliano was ordered to give a deposition in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by Judicial Watch. Brian will talk to the DOJ and the FBI because he has immunity with them, but he won’t talk under oath.

Pagliano pleaded the fifth.

His refusal to answer questions comes after Cheryl Mills, former lawyer to Bill Clinton and Hillary’s Chief of Staff at the State Department, decided to not answer or said she didn’t remember to over 150 questions asked by Judicial Watch.

What does this all mean?

Nobody is talking. There is complete silence around the email server because Hillary’s campaign depends on it.

The pressure is on the FBI to indict Hillary after a State Department report proved that she broke the law with her handling of her private email server.

Even though nobody is talking, it is making her look more and more guilty and her numbers are sliding. She is in a statistical tie with Bernie Sanders in California and losing to Trump nationally now for the first time.

The odds of her being charged with a crime is still about 50/50. There is pressure coming to indict the former secretary of state, but there is a lot of pressure coming from the Obama Administration also to not indict.

An indictment would look really bad for the Democratic Party and hit will really hurt their chances to stay in power come this fall. It also doesn’t help that Obama appointed the directors at both the DOJ and the FBI. We can only hope that their loyalty lies with the truth and punishing criminals rather than being with Obama and the Democratic Party.

Do you think she will be indicted? Let us know in the comments below.


Megyn Kelly has become a huge star in cable news and the number one network, Fox News, may lose their number one female anchor. Today,...