Monday, October 24, 2016


by -

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks and the ever-constant thorn in Hillary’s campaign, is alive and well, but he is not out of the woods.

Last week, there were suspected threats to Julian Assange’s life, and then all of a sudden his Internet was cut off.

Julian has never been charged with a crime, but yet he must remain inside the Ecuadorian Embassy in London or he will be arrested and extradited to the United States.

Freedom eludes the elusive whistleblower, but now he is losing his ability to connect to the outside world.

The Embassy has cut off the use of his Internet and it will remain off until the election is over in the United States.

With Assange offline, the largest mouthpiece for the organization of WikiLeaks is gone. The greatest asset for marketing has been silenced. Assange knows his stuff and has been and investigative journalist and whistleblower for a decade.

He has a large following, and announces all the major leaks, but without him promoting the new releases, then it is up to the press in America to uncover all the truths in the almost daily releases.

The Editorial Board for WikiLeaks responded with a message that seemed to really exclude Ecuador from any blame in this matter. After all, Ecuador is the county that has given Assange asylum and is protecting him. They have housed Assange for over four years.

The statement is more of a plea for Assange’s freedom by announcing his innocence.

See the entire statement from the WikiLeaks Editorial Board below.

There is no doubt that Assange is being targeted because of his releases and if Clinton wins the White House, then he might really be in danger.

Do you think Assange is a hero or a criminal? Let us know in the comments below.

by -

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton met last night at the Alfred E. Smith Charity Dinner, where Hillary asked Donald to “pardon” her.

The Alfred E. Smith Charity Dinner is a tradition each election year, and it is meant to have a night of fun and laughs near the end of a long campaign.

A 1000 people raised $6,00,000 for different children charities associated with the Catholic Church. The event is a “white-tie” formal dinner and roast held at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in New York City.

The joke of the night came when Trump talked about Hillary asking for a pardon, insinuating her guilt for the email scandal.

Donald did a good job and delivered some great jokes, but delivered his speech with in a much subtle manner than we are used to.

Here is Donald Trump’s full speech.

Donald had a few good jokes, and one great one about his wife and media bias. He didn’t get too vicious. He was almost humble in his approach, but he didn’t let Hillary off the hook.

He said after dealing with Hillary he is now starting to think Rosie O’Donnell isn’t that bad.

Hillary took to the stage and was a little more comfortable and a little more vicious.

Here is the Hillary Clinton full speech.

Hillary seemed a lot more comfortable on the mic, and delivered a few good jokes. She also got really personal. Calling him the horse that Putin rides around on, or a marriage joke.

Watching both you see that Donald came off more humble and gracious while Hillary was more vicious.

The night was needed in the fiery debate and things will get back to normal sometime today, but for a night… it was civil.

by -

Tensions with Russia are heating up and this week they took a very dangerous step in letting us know they are serious.

A Russian fighter jet flew within ten feet of a U.S. Navy spy plane over the Black sea.

The jet carried out a maneuver called an intercept to harass and redirect the spy plane.

An official spoke on the condition of anonymity about the incident and said that the event lasted roughly 19 minutes.

He also said the maneuver was “unsafe and unprofessional”.

This is just the latest in several aggressions toward our military around the world.

Iran has been doing similar maneuvers with boats in the Persian Gulf.

A situation is escalating with Russia that is hard to deny at this point. Every day, it seems like, the government is telling us that Russia is hacking our systems and threatening our elections.

Now they are actually threatening American lives with such reckless and dangerous military actions.

All of this comes on the heels of a rough meeting between Putin and Obama in China for the G20 summit over last week that sparked a lot of comments on Twitter.

Obama and Hillary Clinton designed a new “Russian Reset” back when Obama first took office.

It is safe to say that no matter how much the Democrats try and tie the Russian problems to Donald Trump, they only have themselves to blame.

What do you think about the actions of Russia and the failed “Russian reset”? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
World War

The notorious hacker groups Anonymous has a message to the citizens of the world, and it is not good.

Anonymous Official’s YouTube channel released a video on Sunday that spells out the reasons why we are literally on the doorstep of world war three.

As the video starts with the chilling computer voice, the narrator outlines why we are going to war and when it will start.

In the video, one thing that was pointed out was the American perception of “Russian aggression”.

Every time there is any hack on any agency, the DNC or Hillary, the Democrats are very quick to blame the Russians. In many cases, literally as the story breaks, news agencies claim a source that says, “The Russians may be involved in the attack”.

Anonymous also mentions the Chinese in the video regarding trade agreements.

Over the weekend when Obama met with the leader of China there were obvious tensions and they did not make any headway.

There is a tremendous amount of issues rising in the world right now. Everything from the economy to civil rights to terrorism to hunger is threatening our future.

While Obama is attending his last #G20, America looks weak right now. In the eyes of the world, Obama is out of office in the coming months and America is deeply divided in the election.

Americans don’t receive truthful news from American media and most people are too busy arguing about Colin Kaepernick to pay attention to real news.

Right now, it would be wise to pay attention to what is happening in the world, because if Anonymous is correct, then things could get very ugly, very fast.

Just make sure you are prepared for whatever comes next.

Do you believe that Anonymous is right or are they flat out wrong? Let us know in the comments below.

by -

Back in the 90’s Hillary blamed her and Bill’s problems on the “vast right-wing conspiracy”, but now she has a new a new conspiracy she it pitching to America.

Hillary Clinton wants you to believe that there is a huge “alternative-right wing conspiracy” that has organized to reject the Republican Party and stop Hillary.

See her speech here.

She portrays the “alt-right” as racists and anti-America.

Of course Trump had something to say about it. See his response here.

There is only one problem. There is no “alt-right” conspiracy.

There are “alternative” media outlets that report on topics that won’t get covered by CNN. How about not reporting on Hillary’s health and being silent on the George Soros leaks are great examples.

Hillary blames people like Alex Jones for his reporting, but Alex Jones just wants Hillary to stop killing people.

The reason there is an alternative right is because there needs to be. The major media outlets can’t cover the news without slanting or bending the truth, but that doesn’t mean the random news websites are working together.

Hillary is mad when people try to expose her corruption. Even when Bill was in office she blamed all the corruption on the “vast right-wing conspiracy.”

At some point she is going to have to stop blaming the “alt-right” and will have to start defending her policies and record. That won’t help Hillary though, so she will continue to call people racist and blame the “alt-right” as long as she can.

Do you believe Hillary about the “alt-right” conspiracy? Let us know in the comments.

by -

We can’t wait for Trump and Hillary to debate, but now we are expecting a slight change in the show. Debate planners are now planning to add a third podium.

Donald Trump and Hillary are not the two most popular candidates in history, actually quite the opposite, so it is expected that a third party candidate will qualify for the debates.

Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate and two term Republican governor of New Mexico is polling in some places around the country in double digits.

Gary will need to have over 15% in at least five national polls before the first debate kicks off September 28th. If he can reach that 15% mark, then he will make it to the stage.

The Commission on Presidential Debates is trying to make sure that venues and potential moderators are not surprised if Gary makes it to the stage.

Since his own party pushed Bernie Sanders out of the race and the establishment Republicans loathes Donald Trump, there are a lot of Republicans and Democrats that are looking for other options.

Gary Johnson is likely to some attention this year and CNN has already given the Libertarian Party a prime time Town Hall. Something they did not do in 2008 or 2012.

Gary has a real chance this year and he is starting to rise in the polls. Right now the third party candidate who is on the ballot in all 50 states is polling around 9%.

He has some ground to make up over the next month, but as more undecided voters start looking away from the GOP and the Democratic Party, then Johnson could see a steady rise leading up to the debates.

The Libertarian Party has stances that appeal to both Republicans and Democrats and there is a great chance that we will see Gary Johnson on the debate stages this fall.

Want to know more about Gary Johnson, here he is talking about Black Lives Matter on the CNN Town Hall.

Do you think that Gary Johnson will be invited to participate in the debates?

by -
Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton’s email scandal has taken another unique turn that is putting Hillary’s chances of indictment much higher.

When Hillary Clinton took office as Secretary of State in January of 2009, she already had the server up and running. She started using the home server on day one.

The breaking news is that she did not have the necessary certificate on the server to even have the ability to encrypt anything. To put it simply, anyone with any remedial hacking skills could have read her email during that time.

A couple of months later in March of 2009 she realized that she needed to make sure that her home server was encrypted. The real question is why did she wait two months to do this? What made her think of it while she was busy in her new job as Secretary of State?

Well, the two-month lapse looks to be enough time to have people from one or several of the countries she visited break into her server and read all her emails. She visited Japan, China, South Korea and Indonesia from February 16-21 of 2009.

Again, why did she realize she needed to encrypt it? Simple, because someone in the intelligence community told Hillary that her server had been compromised and need to encrypt it immediately.

Secretary Eric Boswell from the State Department wrote a memo to Clinton. In reference to Hillary Clinton’s and her staff publicly fighting to keep their Blackberries during this time, Secretary Boswell said “her attention was drawn to a sentence that indicates we have intelligence concerning this vulnerability during her recent trip to Asia.”

The looks like Hillary allowed a breech in 2009 and it’s possible that China was reading all of her emails.

This news comes out as Hillary is planning on sitting down with the FBI Director for an official interview into his agency’s yearlong investigation into her criminal actions regarding her emails.

Never in our nation’s history has a presidential front-runner been under criminal investigation by the FBI during the elections. Hillary doesn’t think it is a big issue, but the FBI disagrees. What do you think?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

by -

Sometimes you have to ask a ridiculous question to get to the core of a person’s thoughts on a matter. So, with serious consideration . . .

Would you rather . . .

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

by -

A British spy was found murdered in his London apartment–shortly after illegally hacking top secret data belonging to former President Bill Clinton.

Gareth Williams, 31, breached his security clearance by hacking into a guest list for an event that Clinton was going to do, according to the UK newspaper, The Sun, which made the shocking claims on Sunday. He apparently did so as a favor to a friend, who was to be a guest of Clinton’s. It’s unclear why his friend wanted the guest list, or what attendee names were contained on the list.

Williams was later found dead, shortly after returning from a hacking conference in the United States. He was last seen on August 15, 2010, and found eight days later in a padlocked duffel bag in the bathtub of his central London apartment.

His case remains unsolved. London police initially assumed he was killed by a jealous lover–but a number of suspicious circumstances, like the fact that his apartment was “steam-cleaned” to destroy DNA evidence, poke holes in that theory. The Sun also revealed that key voicemails left by Williams for friends and family were deleted in the days that followed his murder–and that another spy may have been dispatched to his apartment to help clean up the mess.

The fact that he had recently breached secret Clinton data has only been recently made public knowledge with The Sun’s story.

Police haven’t commented on this new information, since the death of Williams is an ongoing investigation.

While it might be premature to claim that the Clintons were at all involved in Williams’s murder, it nevertheless raises the interesting question: what exactly did Williams discover in the Clintons’ secret data, and was it enough to kill him over?

by -

Besides exclusively using a secret email account to conduct official government business, it’s likely that Hillary Clinton also used unauthorized electronic equipment—an iPad and an iPhone—as Secretary of State after being warned not to, a veteran State Department official told Judicial Watch this week.

On at least half a dozen occasions Clinton’s top aides asked the State Department’s Office of Security Technology to approve the use of an iPad and iPhone, according to JW’s inside source. Each time the request was rejected for security reasons, the source confirms. The only mobile device that meets the agency’s security standards is the BlackBerry, JW’s source said, adding that the Office of Security Technology—Bureau of Diplomatic Security’s Directorate of Countermeasures must approve all equipment such as cameras, phones and communication devices for all officials.

Evidently set on using the popular Apple devices, Clinton repeatedly challenged the ban and asked management in the Office of Security Technology to allow their use. The executive secretariat responsible for all communications and information technology always rejected the requests, JW’s source affirms. “From day one Hillary was trying to get the iPhone and the iPad approved,” the State Department official told JW. “She kept trying and trying to get us to approve the iPhone and the iPad, but we wouldn’t do it. Technology security experts tested the iPhone and the iPad several times because she constantly wanted them approved, but it never happened.”

The longtime State Department employee reveals that it’s common knowledge among government security tech experts that Apple devices don’t meet strict security standards so agency insiders were puzzled that the Secretary of State was hell-bent on using them. “There was a lot of head-scratching,” JW’s source revealed. Every State Department employee goes through a rigorous security training that includes strict warnings about using non approved equipment or personal email like Clinton did throughout her tenure as the president’s chief foreign affairs officer, the agency insider said.

Clinton’s persistent efforts to persuade the State Department’s technology security experts to approve the use of her favorite Apple devices led those in the division to conclude that she did in fact go through with it. “My guess is she did it and wanted approval after the fact,” JW’s source said. “But no waivers were ever issued.” JW reached out to the State Department for a comment on this latest potential scandal surrounding its former leader, but failed to get a response.

In the meantime, JW has launched a full-scale investigation into Clinton’s secret email system and has filed a number of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests that will likely end up being litigated in federal court. Prior to the email scandal JW already had nearly a dozen active lawsuits in federal court that could be affected by Clinton and her staff’s use of secret email accounts to conduct official government business. Among them is a public-records request for communications between the former Secretary of State and her Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin with Nagla Mahmoud, wife of ousted Egyptian President Mohammad Morsi.



When Comey, the director of the FBI decided not to charge Hillary Clinton, it looks like it had more to do with money than...