Monday, December 5, 2016

CNN

by -
Fox News to lose Megyn Kelly to CNN

Megyn Kelly has become a huge star in cable news and the number one network, Fox News, may lose their number one female anchor.

Today, the Drudge Report posted a picture of Megyn Kelly with the headline “Exclusive: Megyn Kelly May Jump Network”.

Drudge is reporting that Jeff Zucker, the head of CNN is doing everything he can to get Megyn Kelly. A source close to the dealings between Kelly and CNN said Zucker is moving mountains.

“He is moving the Himalayan Mountains to get her, but they are tripped up on money. He simply can’t pay her the $20 million a year FOX has on the table.”

Her stardom would rise, but would she ever leave Fox?

During the summer months of 2016, Fox News was caught in a sexual abuse scandal. Roger Ailes, the only CEO Fox News has ever had, was accused of sexual assault or sexual harassment by several leading ladies at Fox News.

Gretchen Carlson, the former 1989 Miss America, accused her co-host Steve Doocy and Roger Ailes for sexual harassment. Gretchen settled out of court for $20 million.

Andrea Tantaros, who also accused Ailes of sexual misconduct was offered a seven-figure settlement, but refused it according to Tantaros’ lawyer in a statement to Variety.

Megyn Kelly was also one of the ladies that Ailes was inappropriate with and allegedly made unwanted sexual advances. When other top anchors came out to support Ailes as the allegations were flying over the summer, Megyn was silent.

Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, Greta Van Susteren and many more supported Ailes, but the allegations became too much and the CEO was let go.

Megyn Kelly wanted Ailes out and she got what she wanted, and as the election moved into the final months, more controversy started to bubble.

Fellow Fox anchor Sean Hannity attacked Kelly and called her a Clinton supporter back in October.

Tensions have cooled since the election, and Fox News finished with its highest month in four years. A lot of that has to do with Megyn Kelly.

Kelly’s show, The Kelly File had its most watched month since it launched with 3.4 million total viewers.

To top it all off, Megyn Kelly’s new book, “Settle for More” was also released in November and hit number one on the New York Times best seller list. Her ratings rival Bill O’Reilly is number two on the list.

Megyn Kelly is on top of her game, and if there was ever a time she could capitalize on a move, it would be right now. She has a hit show, she has a hit book and she is respected for going head to head against Trump.

If what Drudge is reporting is true, and Kelly is leaving Fox News, she couldn’t have picked a better time.

Plus if she does leave Fox, she will most likely be put in the 8pm spot which would give her the chance to go head to head with Bill O’Reilly, and that may be all the incentive she needs.

Do you think Megyn Kelly is going to leave Fox News? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

2016 Electoral College

Donald Trump won the election on November 8th, but it isn’t final until the 538 members of the Electoral College vote later this month.

The official voting happens on December 19th and the day can’t come fast enough for some members as death threats continue to pour in.

Michael Banerian is a member of the Electoral College and is bound by law to vote for Donald Trump as the winner of his home state Michigan. Even if he wanted to, he couldn’t vote for anyone else.

The facts don’t get in the way of the people that are making Electoral College death threats.

Banerian went on CNN to describe the many attacks he has been receiving from angry Trump haters.

Banerian says he isn’t the only one that is being threatened and harassed during an interview on Fox News.

The outrage and the fallout continue from historically shocking win by Trump. Ironically the outrage is coming from the same side that attacked Trump for saying he may not accept the results of the election.

Do you think the police should take the Electoral College death threats seriously? Let us know your thoughts below.

by -
fake news

Last week a liberal college professor released a list of “fake” news sites, but the ones that she left off are more telling.

Ron Paul, the former third party candidate for president decided to help all the liberals in the U.S. that want to ban “fake” news sites, he made a few additions.

The anti-conservative list of fake news included sites like InfoWars, Breitbart and Independent Journal Review, but none of those sites are fake or misleading. It’s a list of just conservative sites. Even Project Veritas is on the list and it is a non-profit organization.

Ron Paul released a new list that included actual sources to his claims of indiscretions. The list is littered with liberal media giants and all have been proven to deliver false or misleading news in order to help out Hillary Clinton and her campaign.

List of the real

The difference is that every news agency on this list actually tried to mislead the American public during the election.

Breitbart broke the James O’Keefe story for Project Veritas Action that proved the DNC was inciting violence at Trump rallies. That isn’t fake or misleading.

CNN, ABC, MSNBC, New York Times and every other liberal media manipulated the polls and reported on fake news. They actually mislead America and now to cover their mistakes, they want America to ban conservative news sites that call out the corporate media.

Some in the corporate media even helped Hillary cheat. Donna Brazile who worked for CNN at the time, gave Hillary question before debates, then reported that Hillary had won the debates.

The war on fake news is a fake war if the corporate media isn’t also targeted.

First Facebook and Twitter have censored conservative content and Twitter is even banning conservative people. Now they are going after the conservative sites.

Don’t let them, share this article and let your friends know the real list of fake news sites.

by -
hillary lost

Not only did Donald Trump win the presidency and Hillary lose, there is another huge loser that nobody is talking about.

Can we take a moment to talk about how awful the corporate media and the polls turned out to be?

It’s really embarrassing.

Thousands and thousands of people make great livings reporting on the news for the corporate media and none of them got it right. Nobody.

Nobody on MSNBC, nobody on CNN, and nobody on Fox came out before the election to say Trump would win in a potential Electoral College landslide.

Every poll was off and the constant reporting about how Hillary would walk away with the election was so wrong that this is being called the greatest upset in American political history.

Fox News is part of the corporate media and the establishment on the right and they finally realized around 3am that they got it all wrong and Trump was right.

The media got it so wrong that Alex Jones made better predictions than CNN. For weeks, the InfoWars leader said the polls were rigged and Trump is winning in a lot of states, but the corporate media just mocked him.

Who is laughing now, Washington Post?

This was an amazing election because the people we trust to give us factual news with insightful commentary had it so wrong that they may never recover.

The big loser tonight, other than Hillary, is most definitely the corporate media. I you watched any of the MSNBC or CNN coverage, you could see it on their faces– if you could look past all the egg.

Other than Hillary, who do you think the big losers of the night are? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
trump wins

The one thing that most liberals never considered is a Trump victory, but how will they respond to a if Trump actually wins?

Lets just pretend for a moment that liberals are tuned into MSNBC and CNN watching the election results and they start getting a sinking feeling.

They see the Electoral College numbers and Hillary doesn’t have as many as they thought she would. They watch Florida and North Carolina go to Trump and Hillary barely wins Virginia.

Then they really get worried when Michigan and Iowa go for Trump.

At this point, they take to Facebook and to Twitter to start talking about how Russia must be tampering with the numbers.

Then Hillary loses Texas and Utah and Colorado and all of sudden, real panic starts setting in. Trump is only a few states away from claiming victory and they realize for the first time that Trump could win.

They realize that Trump might win.

As the election drags on into the night, most will be to scared to watch the rest and go to sleep in their safe place with the hope that Hillary holds out.

They wake up to find Trump won the election and all hell breaks lose.

Facebook rants will be the first crack in the dam, but expect attacks in real life on Trump fans. Families will disown the Trump fans and every property Trump owns could be vandalized.

The people will turn to the talking heads on TV with no comfort. The networks are as baffled and angry as every other Hillary fan. The rivers will turn to blood and the stars will fall from the heavens.

Celebrities, who said they would move to other countries, actually do. Illegal immigrants will cry, liberal college students will need to seek counseling

Within a week there will be riots, and anyone celebrating a Trump win will be mocked and blamed for ruining this country. The liberals and Hillary’s crime family will go to the mattresses and they will attack and blame anyone they can.

Obama will be upset and he won’t go out and blame people like everyone else, he will just make Trump’s transition to the White House as painful and difficult as possible.

It will be a mess, and it will be the “tolerant” liberals that make it that way.

But to play devil’s advocate, what if Hillary wins, what will the Trump fans do?

Not much. Most Trump fans are voting for him to stand against the corruption of Hillary Clinton and the Democrats, but they also know that Hillary isn’t above cheating to win this election. Any rational Trump fan understands that Hillary is likely going to win if she gets the votes or not.

How do you think it will play out? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
donna brazile

Donna Brazile has been caught red handed. She lied about giving Hillary debate questions and her CNN firing is the least of her problems.

A new email from WikiLeaks shows Donna Brazile, who worked at CNN at the time, receiving debate questions and passing them on to Hillary Clinton.

When the first evidence came to light through WikiLeaks in October, Donna Brazile denied that she gave Hillary a question. Even though the question in the email was exactly the one asked during the March 13th debate with Bernie Sanders.

See the exchange where Donna denies any wrongdoing in an interview with Megyn Kelly.

Just this week, WikiLeaks released a new email with Donna giving another question to the Hillary team.

This question was on the Flint water crisis and Hillary delivered a well-crafted answer.

WikiLeaks has a sterling reputation for authentic releases. There is no reason to believe that the documents have been tampered with or fake.

Donna on the other hand tried to deflect and play the victim in her interview with Megyn Kelly, but now she is in trouble.

On Monday Donna Brazile lost her job at CNN that was on hold while she is the interim leader of the DNC.

The DNC is under a lot of pressure to get rid of Donna, but they want to hold out to see if Hillary wins and then appoint a permanent leader. They may not be able to hold out for another week if more releases come out.

After Donna is replaced, and she will be replaced soon, where will she work?

Brazile has lost all credibility in the media. If CNN fired her then she is going to have a hard time working at any major network.

She violated the trust of the American people, of media and everyone in politics. Only Hillary’s team has any loyalty to her, but how long will that last if Trump wins?

Donna sacrificed her career to help Hillary cheat on a question. That is not very good judgment. Can you imagine if Donald Trump got a question early from Sean Hannity?

What do you think will happen to Donna Brazile? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
cnn

The Clinton campaign doesn’t know how to handle the releases from WikiLeaks, so CNN has decided to just say they are illegal.

If you think the mainstream media is on the side of truth then you have not been paying attention.

CNN has been caught coaching focus groups to seem more pro-Clinton, but what they said about WikiLeaks is pure propaganda with fear tactics.

The Cable News Network actually went on air and said it is illegal for Americans to search WikiLeaks, but somehow CNN is excluded.

See the clip below.

Just to make it clear, it is not illegal for Americans to search the WikiLeaks website and you can even print out from it if you like.

The goal appears to be to scare the viewers and make sure they don’t go and do the research themselves. CNN wants you to trust them for all the news that you need.

Regardless of what the media says, they don’t want you to go to WikiLeaks and search the truth for yourself. We encourage research. Here is the link to search the database of the WikiLeaks release.

Share this article with a friend of yours that believes everything they hear on CNN.

Do you trust the media? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
debate question

John Podesta’s emails keep giving us a lot of information that confirms the suspicions of most Americans that Hillary is corrupt.

The day before the March 13th Town Hall where Hillary and Bernie would field questions from the audience, Donna Brazile, a CNN correspondent at the time sent the Clinton campaign a question that Hillary often has trouble with.

The question was on the death penalty framed around innocent people dying on death row. A man who was wrongfully imprisoned asked the question.

See the exchange and how confident Hillary was with her answer. It was very thought out.

Hillary was ready for the question and there are no emails that let us know that Bernie knew any of the questions ahead of time.

If that wasn’t corrupt enough, then wait until you find out what position Donna Brazile has now.

Brazile is the interim head for the DNC after Debbie Wasserman-Schultz left amid the DNC email leak.

The DNC replaced a cheat with a cheat and they all are trying to help Hillary win the White House by any means necessary.

Next up is the denying game from the DNC and from Brazile, but that is the same thing that the DNC did immediately following their email release.

WikiLeaks continues to be a thorn in the side of Hillary Clinton and a torch bearer for truth.

Do you think that Donna Brazile should resign from the DNC? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
cough

Hillary Clinton has a lot of people wondering if she is healthy, but when she broke out into a coughing attack she revealed the cause of her ailments.

It happened again.

Hillary Clinton was on stage at a rally with Tim Kaine when she started coughing. Guess what she blamed it on?

That’s right. She said that Trump made her “allergic”.

Nobody on our staff is a doctor, but that doesn’t seem correct.

The latest coughing attack came on the heels of CNN firing Dr. Drew for questioning Hillary’s health and then demanding him to retract his statement.

It is clear that Hillary is having some health issues and they seem to be keeping her off the campaign trail.

In August, Hillary spoke at rallies and events in front of an estimated 15,000 people. Donald Trump spoke to an estimated 140,000 Americans.

Trump is older and working harder in this campaign. He takes Sunday off from speeches, but Hillary is taking up to four days off a week to relax.

by -
hack

The FBI is investigating another hack and before anyone knows the facts, the liberal media is already blaming Russia.

Somebody hacked into the email accounts of reporters at the New York Times and possibly other news organizations.

Within an hour of reports coming out of the hack Tuesday afternoon, CNN broke the news that it had reports that the Russians were to blame.

When the DNC was hacked last month just before their convention, Hillary and the other party leaders blamed Russia immediately as well.

There is no definitive proof that the hack even took place and CNN is already blaming Russia.

The New York Times didn’t confirm the attack and the FBI hasn’t made an official comment yet.

Despite the FBI and New York Times not speaking on the hack yet, CNN somehow already knows Russia is at fault.

Blaming Russia without evidence is something that Democrats are doing more and more often and that could be very bad for America. Especially if WikiLeaks’ founder Julian Assange is correct in his accusations that murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich was the one that leaked the DNC emails.

It is too early to blame Russia or anyone else for the hack, but by playing the blame game we are distracted that many journalists were hacked and who knows what information could be out there now.

What do you think of CNN blaming the Russians before there is any evidence?

TRENDING STORIES

We have not heard much from Hillary after she lost the most incredible election in modern history, but now she surfaces to reach a...