Thursday, February 23, 2017

Editor’s Choice

by -
CNN Tapes

James O’Keefe did exactly what he said he was going to do. Project Veritas has released over a 100 hours of audio from inside the CNN newsroom.

According to the Project Veritas website, this is just part 1 of the “CNN Leaks” and they describe how they acquired the audio.

“Project Veritas was given over 200 hours of audio from an anonymous source earlier this month. This secretly recorded audio was obtained at CNN’s Atlanta headquarters in 2009.”

Much like WikiLeaks, Project Veritas is dumping the raw audio online and letting journalists and home researchers go through it all.

Listen to the CNN audio at

One of the leaks from CNN feature former employee Joe Sterling admitting his love for Obama.

The release is part of a much bigger campaign to target the corporate media. James took to Twitter earlier on Thursday to offer cash to anybody that comes forward with information for future releases.

James went on to tweet that he would go to jail to protect a source.

On Wednesday, the day before the release James accidentally sent an Instagram picture that previewed the drop on CNN. You can see the domain in the background on the TV.

Tomorrow. #CNNLeaks

A post shared by James O'Keefe (@jamesokeefeiii) on

So many people visited the site when the tapes were released earlier Thursday that part of it crashed. There seems to be a lot of people that don’t like CNN.

Thoughts? Comment below.

by -

UPDATE (2/23/2017)Project Veritas and James O’Keefe have released the CNN tapes. Click here.

James O’Keefe and his teams at Project Veritas and Project Veritas Action have a history of exposing corruption. With a camera and a pimp costume James took down A.C.O.R.N., and his undercover videos helped expose the inner workings of the DNC and played a roll in Hillary losing the election.

Now, James and his team are going after the media.

On Sean Hannity’s radio show on Tuesday, James O’Keefe announced that he is releasing hours of footage from inside a major media company.

“In the next 48 hours, Project Veritas, like WikiLeaks, will be releasing hundreds of hours of tape from within the establishment media. Our next target is in fact, the media. We’ve had people on the inside come to us. Just like Julian Assange has people come to him, w’ve had people, sources come to us and give us information and we are going to be releasing it WikiLeaks style this week.”

Hear the clip of the show below.

O’Keefe didn’t mention CNN by name, but suggested that it was a major media outlet that “Trump has really been talking about.” Hannity immediately said, “so, it’s CNN.”

CNN has not been very fair in their coverage of James O’Keefe in the past, so it makes sense that they would be the targets of a Project Veritas investigation.

Here is a video where the CNN reporters try to discredit James before they report on his videos during the election.

CNN isn’t the only network that has tried to discredit James and his work. On the latest episode of Homeland, the writers take and unusual swipe at O’Keefe by adding his name to an Alex Jones type character.

Right now, it doesn’t matter what CNN or any other station says about James O’Keefe, it only matters what is on the tapes. That is why James O’Keefe is so successful at what he does. It doesn’t matter what lies people say about him or his or his organization, the tapes don’t lie and it is really hard to argue with video evidence.

Just ask Bob Creamer.

Thoughts? Comment below.

by -

The Trump White House is planning a big immigration push that could start a war over immigration in the United States.

There are few topics that have fueled the anti-Trump protestors than immigration, and Trump’s new “big immigration launch” is going to infuriate them.

The White House is working with the Department of Homeland Security on a proposal that will dramatically add and empower thousands of new officers.

According to a senior administration official, Fox News is reporting that the proposal will hire new officers to fast-track deportations.

The new secretary of the DHS, John Kelly, is asking for 10,000 new ICE officers in the proposal as well as 5,000 additional U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers.

Kelly blames the rise in immigration as the need for the new recruits.

“The surge of immigration at the southern border has overwhelmed federal agencies and resources and has created a significant national security vulnerability to the United States.”

Although this proposal doesn’t focus on the border wall, the new DHS head thinks that is “necessary” to build the wall.

Trump isn’t looking to change any laws to get his way on immigration; he is looking just to enforce the laws that are currently in place.

The push for more immigration agents is another campaign promise that Trump has now kept.

Trump’s actions are solidifying him as the leader that many supporters hoped for, but to millions on the left, they see his actions as more evidence that Trump needs to be stopped.

There is no doubt the left is going to try and stop Trump regardless of what he does, but Trump’s new hires for DHS will go through with no issues.

Trump’s travel ban to countries that support terrorism is a different story. The executive order is having a hard time making it through the courts and CNN is reporting that Trump is “preparing a new travel ban”.

When Trump issued the original travel ban protesters almost shut down airports.

What will they do when Trump hires 15,000 new agents to crack down on illegal immigrants?

Thoughts? Comment below.

by -
John McCain

In the recent weeks, Republican Senator John McCain has taken such a stance against Donald Trump that it begs the question, is McCain a “Hero or Traitor”?

There is no question that John McCain’s time as a prisoner of war has made him a war hero, but his military service isn’t in question. McCain’s service to our country as an elected leader is in question.

In a trip to Germany on Friday, McCain said that the Trump administration is in “disarray” when he spoke to the Munich Security Conference.

In an interview with Meet The Press, McCain said Trump is wrong for going after the media. The Arizona Senator said, “That is how dictators get started.”

McCain has also sided with Democrats during the confirmation votes.

Why is John McCain so against Trump?

Rand Paul, the Kentucky Senator came to Trump’s defense on Sunday when discussing his thoughts on ABC’s This Week as he described McCain’s motivations.

“Everything that he says about the president is colored by his own personal dispute he’s got running with President Trump, and it should be taken with a grain of salt, because John McCain’s the guy who’s advocated for war everywhere.”

Paul went on to say that the disagreement comes over “foreign policy”, but says, “John McCain has been wrong on just about everything for almost four decades.”

Rand Paul could be right, McCain votes for war and boots on the ground every chance he gets, but could he be mad about something else too?

John McCain is a war hero, and some on the left are calling him they’re only chance.

McCain may be winning some new fans among Democrats, he is not winning over Trump supporters. Some believe he is now an “enemy of the state”.

John McCain support, like everything else in politics, is very divided right now and only time will tell if he is a political hero or traitor.

Do you agree with John McCain? Comment below.

by -

On Thursday there were two large terror attacks and a terrorist was caught in London, but the corporate media focused on Trump’s press conference.

On Thursday a car filled with explosives blew up in Baghdad that killed at least 55 people.

ISIS claimed responsibility for the attack as tensions and terror strikes are climbing in the capital city.

On Thursday, The Guardian reported that ISIS claimed responsibility for a suicide bomb blast in Pakistan that killed at lease 70 people and injured 150 more at at crowded religious shrine.

The shrine dedicated to Sufi saint Lal Shahbaz Qalandar in Sehwan was attacked on the busiest day of the week for the holy place according to the Guardian.

In London, man was arrested on suspicion of preparing terrorist acts.

The authorities have a man in custody, but the details are few at this point.

On a day when over a hundred people were killed by ISIS in different attacks, the corporate media is focused almost on whatever Trump says or does.

For example, here is a tweet from CNN on Thursday, one of many that focused on the president.

Guess how many tweets CNN sent out regarding the ISIS claimed terrorist attacks? None!

Maybe reporting on the terrorist attacks by ISIS would validate Trump’s assertion that ISIS is a real threat.

Thoughts? Comment below.

by -

Democrats would like you to believe the anti-Trump protests around the country represent a grassroots movement, but who is really behind it all?

Paul Sperry, an author and columnist for the New York Post thinks that Obama and his nonprofit, Organizing for America, is working behind the scenes to undermine Trump at every turn. In fact, the organization was named Obama for America until he won his second election. Then they changed the name to Organizing for America.

Sperry suggests that Obama is using the Organizing For America group to orchestrate the protests and disruptions at town halls.

In an interview with Fox & Friends, Sperry explains how the Jason Chaffetz town hall was sabotaged by the OFA.

Here is a clip of the Chaffetz twon hall and the dramatic feedback he got from the crowd.

Generally when a President leaves office after his eight years are up, they go back home and relax. Not Obama.

The former president is taking a little time off, but then returning back to Washington to live, just two miles from the White House. Obama will be in the center of all the action, and Sperry claims with Obama’s legacy on the line, he seems to be taking an active part in undermining Donald Trump.

With an organization like OFA and the funding that Obama has available, Sperry suggests that Obama is forming a shadow government to uphold his legacy and restore the progressives to power.

At no time in history has something like this happened. Obama does not plan on sitting around and enjoying retirement. He even promised with his first Tweet after Trump took office that he would be back to work soon.

Back to work? He needs a new job. Unfortunately if Sperry is correct, then his new job will to ruin the Trump presidency.

Thoughts? Comment below.

by -

Everyday the corporate media tries to tie Trump to the Russians, but what is the truth now that Russia is starting to bang the war drums?

First the Democrats blamed the DNC and Podesta email leaks on the Russians with no real evidence. There is still no concrete evidence that connects the Russian Government to the leaks.

Then the claims from the left started rolling in after the election that Russia helped throw the election in favor of Trump. Again there is no concrete evidence to suggest that Russia was involved or that it even happened.

Images of Putin and Trump in love have been spread through social media and even projected onto the side of a large building in NYC.

The corporate media is doing their best to frame Trump as a president with deep connections to Russia. Here is an example from CNN, they wrote about two Trump advisors and their alleged ties to the Russian government.

It is true that Trump’s second campaign manager, Paul Manafort, did have connections with Russia and was fired in the summer before the election. Michael Flynn was the other “top aide” that communicated regularly to Russians and as of Monday he is no longer involved in the Trump administration.

If you were to believe the corporate media blindly, then you would think the Russians helped Trump in the campaign, and then helped him win by rigging the election.

Here is the big problem.

In the past week, a Russian spy ship was spotted moving up the east coast monitoring sub stations, military bases and intercepting communications.

Putin was caught this week deploying new cruise missiles that violate an arms control treaty. The New York Times calling it “a major test for President Trump as his administration is facing a crisis over its ties to Moscow.”

Why would Russia become antagonistic with the United States if they just helped us elect Trump? Why are we not seeing more partnerships between the two countries? We are seeing just the opposite; Russia is getting more aggressive.

The corporate media is working so hard to frame Trump as a secret friend of Putin, they are missing the obvious signs of an escalation in tensions. They are even contributing to the tensions with their focus on the Russian connections.

Putin is smart, and he will use the press in America as propaganda in his country to rally support for his next political move and our corporate media is playing right into his hands. It seems they are helping Russia more than Trump.

Thoughts? Comment below.

by -

The corporate media is downplaying the most significant turn of events to take place since President Trump took office.

Here it is:

An agency of the United States government targeted a top level Executive Branch appointee to discredit him and force his resignation . . . and they succeeded.

In case you missed it, retired Army three-star general, Michael Flynn, was serving as Donald Trump’s National Security Advisor.

Before taking his position within the Trump administration, Flynn spoke with a Russian Ambassador regarding Obama-imposed sanctions.

Regardless of whether or not the conversation was inappropriate, Flynn misled Vice President Pence about the conversation.

Not a cool thing to do and Flynn resigned after details about the conversation were leaked to the press.

In the four paragraphs above, the key phrase is “leaked to the press.”

Someone within America’s intelligence apparatus not only spied on a U.S. citizen, buy they leaked details of the wire-tapped conversation to the press in order to damage the Office of the Presidency.

What . . . the . . . –ck?

On Tuesday morning following his resignation the night before, Flynn took to the cable networks to explain that the wiretapping and leaks were illegal.

While the leaks were clear violations of security, unfortunately the wiretapping was PERFECTLY legal.

We brought this upon ourselves.

Back in 2007, George Bush pushed for an amendment to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

Falling in line of the Orwellian naming conventions of the government, the amendment was called the “Protect America Act of 2007.”

The Act eased restrictions on our wiretapping and cyber-spying activities by changing the law to require only one party of a conversation to be located overseas.

And get this; if a conversation between two Americans takes place within U.S. borders, but goes through a foreign router or switchboard, then . . . boom . . . the government can totally spy on that conversation.

So Flynn’s conversation with a Russian Ambassador was perfectly in line with the regulations of FISA.

Many Americans think, “I’m not a terrorist so I’m not worried about it.”

What happened to Mike Flynn should change that thinking forever.

If rogue intelligence agents can spy on a top-level administration official . . . more importantly, the National Security Advisor . . . what do you think they could do to you?

If you live in the D.C. area, you should live in fear.

Cut off an employee of the NSA on 395 and they can get to work, grab their coffee, look up your plate numbers, route your emails through a router in Norway, and you’re privacy is shot.

Big user of Social Media and use a hashtag like #lifefreeordie? You can be grouped into a pool of “domestic terrorists” and have your communications monitored (similar scenarios have happened).

Make no mistake; the lack of privacy at the hands of the government turns them from servants of society to overseers of the unwashed masses.

It’s time to repeal with Protect America Act of 2007 and give privacy back to Americans.

by -

Hillary Clinton has been quiet since her devastating loss back in November, but some are saying that her political career is not done.

There have been rumors that Hillary might run for Mayor of New York City, rumors the Clinton camp hasn’t officially silenced. A Hillary Clinton insider told the New York Post that Hillary is “50-50” on running for mayor of New York.

Hillary may not want to get out of politics yet, but what does the DNC think about that?

The DNC could be for the run since they have yet to apologize to the millions of Bernie Sanders fans that feel cheated by the Democratic National Committee from the information found in the DNC WikiLeaks.

The Party marginalized Bernie’s supporters in 2016 when it worked behind the scenes to support Hillary and torpedo Bernie. There are millions of Democrats that are still upset that Bernie didn’t the nomination.

Even with the shocking defeat on election day, the DNC doesn’t seem to be changing it’s course and neither does Hillary.

When Mitt Romney lost to Barrack Obama, he didn’t take to Twitter to throw jabs at the president. Neither did John McCain. Normally, when a candidate losses in a big election they remain quiet and resist the urge to take shots at their former rival. That is not the case for the latest Democrat candidate who might be eyeing a Hillary 2020 run.

When Trump’s executive order banning immigration from seven countries in the Middle East and Africa lost for a third time in court last week, Hillary took to Twitter to throw a jab. Some would call this trolling.

Is Hillary even out of campaign mode? Is she just taking a shot, or does she still have ambitions to square off with Donald one more time in 2020?

Politico and Huffington Post both published articles over the weekend that had Hillary 2020 in the title, and offered up reasons why they think Hillary could be contemplating another run.

Hillary, after all, never said in her concession speech that she would not run again. She left it open. If she ran again, she would be 73 years old, and in all fairness, Bernie was 74 when he ran this past year.

Hillary may have a desire to get back into politics, but is it a good idea? Hillary lost to Barrack Obama and to Trump. Two very different candidates handed Hillary two unexpected losses. She went into both elections as the clear favorite, but it never worked out. Maybe what she needs is to be the underdog, which she would most certainly be if she decided to run again. Or maybe the Democrats need to find a new winning solution that doesn’t include Hillary.

Do you think Hillary should run in 2020? Let us know in the comments below.

by -

Trump has a major problem with his administration, and it is the largest distraction to Trump’s agenda. No it isn’t his Twitter account, which is a major distraction, but the leaks in the Trump administration threaten everything he wants to do.

Every day there is some new source with inside knowledge of the administration, releasing some bit of information that is damaging to the president.

A New York Times article revealed that an aide told the press they were working in the dark because they couldn’t figure out how the lights turned on.

The article went on to claim that Trump enjoys sitting alone, watching television wearing a bathrobe.

Of course Trump took to twitter to say the author “writes total fiction”.

One of the largest leaks in this short administration is the call that Trump had with the Australian Prime Minister. Quotes were leaked to the press that asserted that Trump said that the call with Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull was “the worst call by far” of any call he had with a world leader.

The news did not make his supporters feel any more comfortable and it gave more ammo to his growing number of detractors. The leaks are proving a constant flow of ammo to the left.

Tensions are growing because of the leaks in an already divided White House. Reince Priebus is the President’s Chief of Staff, but he also represents the establishment Republicans.

Steve Bannon is a senior counselor to the president and has criticized the Republican establishment for years as the executive of Breitbart News. Bannon is about as anti-establishment as you can get.

With Trump being in politics really for the first time in his life, he hasn’t been able to build a solid team around him that he trusts and for good reason.

The administration is plagued with leaks, and if this continues, it is possible that Trump will get his family more involved. For now, the leaks are a major distraction and keeping the Democrats in the game when the White House should be in a position to push their agenda.

If Trump can’t find a way to stop the leaks, then he will spend all his time managing his team and putting out fires and not enough time governing.

What do you think Trump should do about his leak problem? Let us know in the comments.


Democrats would like you to believe the anti-Trump protests around the country represent a grassroots movement, but who is really behind it all? Paul Sperry,...