Monday, June 26, 2017


by -

A federal judge has ordered the State Department to release information regarding what former President Barack Obama knew about the Benghazi attacks. The judge ordered that all previously redacted information in Hillary Clinton’s emails concerning the Obama administration be brought to light.

Judicial Watch, a conservative government watchdog announced U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s order on Friday. The group reported that Jackson has ordered the State Department to submit “eight identical paragraphs” of information that were extracted from two of Clinton’s emails on Sept. 13, 2012.

While, the subject line on the emails reads as: “FW: Quick Summary of POTUS Calls to Presidents of Libya and Egypt.” The content of the emails is said to include the conservations that then-President Barack Obama had with leaders of Egypt and Libya two days after the attack that left four Americans dead, including the U.S. Ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens. Once the emails are released, they could shed light on what Clinton and Obama knew then.

It is also be noted that the State Department had claimed that the emails deserved a “deliberative process” Freedom of Information Act exemption. However, when Jackson completed her personal review of the documents, she said that the documents in fact did not meet the criteria for the exemption. The State Department went on to request Jackson to reconsider her order, and argued that the emails were mistakenly claimed under the exemption and should be ruled under the classified information exemption.

The Judicial Watch argued back that there was no mistake in the exemption status, but was much rather an attempt by the State Department to protect Clinton by “avoiding identifying emails on Clinton’s unofficial, non-secure email server as classified.”

Judicial Watch stated, “An agency’s deliberate withholding of a FOIA claim, either to gain a tactical advantage or, as appears to be the case here, to protect the agency’s interests and those of its former head, is ‘a motive undoubtedly inconsistent with FOIA’s broad remedial purpose’ …”

In a statement, Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch made an appeal to President Trump and questioned whether he knew that his State Department is still trying to protect Clinton.

He said, “Does President Trump know his State and Justice Departments are still trying to provide cover for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama?” Fitton said. “An extraordinary court ruling that could result in key answers about the Benghazi outrage is being opposed by the Trump administration.”

by -

A nationally known politician is facing heated criticism over emails–and no, it’s not Hillary Clinton.

U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham, a moderate Republican from South Carolina, has announced: “I don’t email,” on NBC’s Meet the Press.

He continued: “You can have every email I’ve ever sent: I’ve never sent one. I don’t know what that makes me.”

Graham’s admission garnered tremendous criticism–and it’s not hard to understand why. In the digital age, it’s inconceivable that any professional would be able to complete their job adequately without having one of the most basic online tools at their disposal.

But worse, Graham sits on the powerful Subcommittee for Privacy, Technology, and the Law. Despite never having used one of the most basic and ubiquitous online services, Graham has introduced multiple bills that dictate internet regulations for the rest of us.

This provides more evidence of the sad fact that too many of our political leaders are shockingly out of touch with how regular Americans live–and begs the question as to whether they should be the ones representing us in Washington in the first place.

Following the flap, Graham tried to explain in another interview: “I’ve tried not to have a system where I can just say the first dumb thing that comes to my mind. I’ve always been concerned.”

Sadly, it appears that not using email has not prevented Senator Graham from saying the first dumb thing that comes into his head.


Guarding Republicans

Over the weekend, the New York Times was slammed for running a piece where the news outlet apparently tried to cover up the motives...