Friday, December 9, 2016

FBI

by -
hillary

Just two weeks ago, Hillary went from being one of the most powerful people in the world to losing the presidency and it keeps getting worse for the former Secretary of State.

The Clinton Foundation is not raising money like it once had, and it could get a lot worse.

In 2014, the year before Hillary announced her run for the White House, the Clinton Foundation raised $172 million and she earned $3.6 million making speeches.

In 2015, she announced her run and the Clinton Foundation lost 37% in donations by only raising $108 million and getting paid $357,500 for speeches.

Currently we are in 2016 and the Clinton Foundation came under fire from the Trump Campaign and there is a criminal investigation going on in the FBI right now about Hillary’s ties to the foundation and the State Department.

The Clinton Foundation was the subject of many WikiLeaks emails that had a tremendous negative affect on Hillary’s public perception. WikiLeaks didn’t help Bill or Chelsea too much either. It can’t be good for the Clinton brand.

We are just learning the numbers for 2015, and it will be a while until we really know how bad the Clinton Foundation dropped this year.

With so much airtime and column inches dedicated to the criminal activity of the Clinton Foundation and Hillary’s subsequent loss, it wouldn’t be much of a surprise if the Clinton Foundation changed its strategy and downsizes.

The prevailing thought inside the Democratic Party is that Obama is going to pardon Hillary on his way out of office.

Obama might be able to keep Hillary out of prison, but if that happens, the Clinton Foundation will lose a lot of the credibly, power and any prestige it still has left.

The only hope for the future of the Clinton Foundation is to begin to push Chelsea into the spotlight and towards positions of power.

Hillary and the Clinton’s have their future up in the air right now. They never planned for this. They thought they would be filling the new Hillary administration with Clinton Foundation donors right now. They are just trying to figure out what to do next and their only option to save their empire may be Chelsea.

Do you think the Clinton Foundation will continue to function five years from now? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

by -
chaos

The moment we have been waiting for, the election on Tuesday, could just be the start of the chaos that will follow.

The FBI building was vandalized with the word “corrupt” spray painted on the side. Two men were arrested Saturday for the crime, but they hit Trump International Hotel as well.

Painting “corrupt” on the side of an FBI building would be unthinkable a year ago, but now a lot of people on both sides feel the agency has been corrupted.

What does it say about rule of law in America when many citizens question the FBI’s intentions?

The popular feeling about the FBI and the growing hate for police from the left and minority groups, law and order is being threatened.

Law and order is just one part of the chaos, the economy looks like it will take a hit too.

The “Father of Reaganomics” made a startling claim about what will happen to the stock market after the election.

“The markets are hideously inflated… If you don’t sell before the election, certainly do it afterwards. Government is going to be totally paralyzed regardless of who wins. There could be a 25% draw down on the markets.”

Twenty five percent is huge. That would mean that the stock market would drop from close to 18,000 to 13,500. A drop like that could be devastating to an already struggling economy.

It won’t help that the country is so divided over this election; more people will be absolutely against an elected president than any other time in recent history.

On top of all of our problems, the world has some major problems too.

It has been reported that Russia is going to attack ISIS in Syria within 24 hours and Al-Qaeda wants to attack here. There are threats against New York, Texas and Virginia.

ISIS wants to kill Americans on Election Day.

The Department of Homeland Security is weighing options to take over the elections on Tuesday.

CIA is talking about attacking Russia online if they tamper with our elections.

If we can make it through the election and pick a president, then that could be when the real fun starts.

Our trust in law and order, our democracy, media and our elected officials is reaching an all-time low and that could spell disaster.

We are living in a dangerous time. Regardless of who wins, things are going to get worse before they get better.

Do you think everything will be peaceful after the election or do you expect chaos? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

by -
weiner

When the newly found emails discovered on Anthony Weiner’s device were linked to Hillary Clinton, a unique connection is coming together.

When “Carlos Danger”, also known as Anthony Weiner, was caught sending underwear pictures to women with his son sleeping beside him, his career was finally finished.

He was a strong Senator until he got in trouble sending lewd pictures across Twitter and then again busted for the same thing after a failed run for Mayor.

Anthony Weiner is a three time loser and Huma Abedin, his wife is finally leaving him after their son was picturd asleep in one of the lewd pictures.

Huma just happens to be Hillary Clinton’s top aide.

After the last round of pictures from Weiner’s exploits were made public, Huma filed for divorce and the FBI started investigating the disgraced politician.

There is a very real possibility that Hillary got involved in Huma’s ordeal and pushed her connections in the FBI to pursue the investigation.

There is a real possibility that Hillary and Huma encouraged the investigation into Anthony Weiner. During that investigation, the FBI found evidence that could be used against Hillary and Huma and could bring down the entire election for Hillary.

You have to give Huma and Hillary credit for standing by their men in tough times, but Huma may have stayed with Weiner a little too long.

Getting a divorce in the middle of a major election can be distracting when you are Hillary Clinton’s top aide that even read Hillary’s emails for her.

Huma shared a device with Weiner that was automatically backing up Huma’s emails, but she didn’t disclose that to the FBI when questioned. She was ordered to deliver all devices to the FBI, but clearly she didn’t.

Huma could be the fall person for all of this and Hillary could lose the election. It could all be because Hillary and Huma pushed the FBI to investigate Weiner.

If Huma and Hillary didn’t push for the investigation then they are in big trouble, because the same US Attorney that called for the Weiner Investigation is the same person that is investigating the Clinton Foundation.

Preet Bharara is the US Attorney in the prosecutor’s office that subpoenaed Weiner’s devices and could be looking for more evidence in his Clinton Foundation investigation.

If Preet isn’t for Hillary then she could be in a lot of trouble, especially if she doesn’t win the election.

Do you think Hillary pushed for the investigation into Anthony Weiner? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

by -
fbi

The wife of the deputy director of the FBI who oversaw the Clinton email investigation was given a lot of money from this Clinton ally.

Terry McAuliffe, the Virginia Governor, is in some hot water again for helping the Clintons.

First he made it so felons could vote in the presidential election, potentially giving Hillary thousands of new voters.

Now McAuliffe is in trouble for giving the wife of the deputy director of the FBI $675,000 for her senate campaign.

Dr. Jill McCabe is the wife of the FBI deputy director, and a third of her campaign funds came from McAuliffe’s own personal Super PAC and from the Virginia Democratic Party.

McAuliffe gave $467,500 to McCabe’s campaign and the Virginia Democratic Party, which is heavily influenced by McAuliffe, gave an additional $207,788 in support.

McAuliffe said he gave because he thought McCabe would be a good state senator. Despite losing the election to Republican Dick Black, her husband still had his job to do.

Mr. McCabe became the deputy director of the FBI and was put in charge of Hillary’s email scandal.

McCabe was involved in the investigation that did not recommend criminal charges to the DOJ for Hillary’s “reckless” attention to classified information.

McCabe’s wife isn’t the only one to see a bunch of money come from the Clintons; James Comey’s brother is paid by the Clinton Foundation to audit their books.

There is no smoking gun right now proving that the FBI did something wrong, but there is a lot of money surrounding the top investigators. At the very least it seems to be a blatant case of conflicts of interest. Conflicts of interest happen a lot around the Clintons.

Do you think the money was a pay off? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
comey

When Comey, the director of the FBI decided not to charge Hillary Clinton, it looks like it had more to do with money than motive.

Director James Comey told the American people that Hillary did have classified information; she did delete state property and didn’t turn over all work emails.

Despite the apparent laws Hillary Clinton broke by having a home server for conducting federal business, the director of the FBI cleared her by saying she had no intent on breaking the law.

He called her reckless and that was the end of the email scandal. Well, until now.

A source close to the workings of the FBI and the Clinton Foundation has released his findings to the press.

It has come out that James Comey accepted positions and financial compensation for working as a general counsel for Lockheed Martin.

Comey worked for Lockheed and in one year, the first year Lockheed would become a major Clinton Foundation donor, Comey was paid $6 million in 2010.

The same year, Lockheed Martin won 17 private contracts from the State Department. Guess who ran the State Department in 2010? Hillary Clinton.

Lockheed Martin also joined the American Chamber of Commerce in Egypt and the group paid Bill Clinton $250,000 for a speech in the year, 2010.

To take it a step further, James allegedly made sure his brother got in the loop too.

Peter Comey, the brother of the FBI director works as Senior Director of Real Estate Operations for the Americas for a company named DLA Piper.

DLA Piper is the company that performed the “audit” on the Clinton Foundation in November.

The employees of DLA Piper as a whole have donated a very large amount to elect Hillary Clinton.

In fact, DLA Piper ranks number five on the Hillary Clinton’s all-time “Top Contributors” list. DLA Piper comes in right above Goldman Sachs.

Ironically or coincidentally James Comey owns a mortgage on his brother’s house as a Private Party lender.

When looking at the way the FBI ran the investigation into Hillary, it is clear that someone was covering for her. The lead agent on the case resigned in the middle of the investigation and many think it was because he wasn’t allowed to do his job properly.

Agents were blocked from interrogating witnesses, blocked from serving search warrants for key evidence and even allowed the pay-for-play scandal involving the Clinton Foundation to be swept under the rug.

We are finding out that the investigation was a mess from the beginning and now we are learning why.

Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation helped make James Comey and his brother rich! Why would he want that gravy train to stop?

Let us know your thoughts on the FBI director being involved in the corruption that surrounds Hillary Clinton in the comments below.

by -
Lawyers

The scandal over Hillary’s email server is expanding to a private contractor who deleted emails, but did Hillary’s lawyers demand it?

When Hillary decided to use her home server it opened a huge can of worms that is exploding on her campaign right now.

New evidence now points to a private contractor who deleted thousands of emails for the Clinton campaign, but were they pressured by Clinton’s lawyers?

There are serious allegations of obstruction of justice and this timeline might help you understand.

3/2/2015 – The New York Times breaks the story that Hillary Clinton used her own private and unsecure email server when Secretary of State.

3/4/2015 – Congress issued a subpoena and preservation order for all of the email documents and by law Hillary must preserve everything on her server.

3/9/2015 – IT firm that was managing Clinton’s server is told to retain all the emails from Hillary’s server.

3/25/2015 – Clinton’s lawyers and legal team conducts a conference call with the IT firm.

3/31/2015 – Less than a week after the call with the lawyers and three weeks after being told to preserve all the data, the IT firm deletes the Clinton email archive.

They didn’t just delete the archive, they used a sophisticated program that scrubs all evidence and deletes any record permanently.

It is clear that the IT firm listened to Hillary’s team and not the government and they could be in big trouble.

Hillary’s legal team could be in big trouble too if they pressured or paid the IT firm to delete the files.

There is a real case of obstruction of justice here and most likely somebody is going to go down for this crime. There will be a fall guy or gal because we know for sure Hillary will weasel her way out of this like the FBI investigation.

Do you think that Hillary should be charged with obstruction of justice? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
FBI

This election year has been one for the history books but it’s not over as the FBI gave an unprecedented warning to both political campaigns.

The FBI warned both the Trump and Hillary teams that they could be the targets of foreign spies.

The warning was issued Wednesday during two different security briefings in Washington D.C.

Both candidates are getting their firsts security briefings, but this is different. The FBI tried to make it look routine, but the warning is not.

In this election we have heard a lot about email scandals, email hacks and vulnerable computer systems, but this warning is for something different.

The FBI is warning that agents working for foreign spy agencies could be trying to gain positions in the campaigns.

One campaign source said that the meeting was “not precipitated by any particular threat”, but the ideas should make the campaigns a little nervous.

Not only do they have to worry about attacking each other, but now spies could be trying to infiltrate their campaigns.

This week the FBI also announced that Russian hackers stole voter information form the Illinois voter system and another investigation is going on regarding another Russian hacker attacking the Arizona election system.

The warnings also come while the FBI is still investigating the DNC hack, which lead to many top ranking DNC officials to step down.

We are seeing an unprecedented amount of threats to this year’s election, but lets be honest, after the primary we witnessed, anything is possible.

Let us know your thoughts about the foreign threats below in the comments.

by -
Special Prosecuter

It’s a time-honored tactic – when attacked, change the subject. For generations, politicians of all stripes and parties have tried to change the topic of public discussion whenever their foibles and failings become the target of media attention. And, so it goes with Hillary Clinton.

The beleaguered Democratic presidential nominee has clumsily attempted one verbal sleight of hand after another, in an effort to avoid being held accountable for the highly questionable – if not unlawful — shenanigans between the Department of State during her tenure as Secretary and her family’s cash cow, the Clinton Foundation. Hillary’s efforts should not be permitted to shield her from answering to a Special Prosecutor.

The most recent – but probably not the final – factor that has caused Mrs. Clinton to sweat, is the revelation that the 15,000 e-mails discovered by the FBI not to have been previously turned over to the State Department as Clinton claimed, raise questions anew about whether donations to the Clinton Foundation were tied to contacts those donors had with the State Department.

At the juncture where Mrs. Clinton now finds herself, there are two very distinct choices open to her. Most public officials and candidates, when facing damaging but false allegations of wrongdoing, understand that taking the high road and demanding, or at least “welcoming,” an open and objective investigation, puts them in the strongest political posture to survive the attacks.

The other path – more often taken by those being hounded by damaging charges that probably are not false, hunker down, bluster, and change the subject. Here is where we find Hillary Clinton — hurling mud at the GOP standard bearer, Donald Trump.

In a feat of impressive imagination, Clinton responded to the latest evidence of wrongdoing that has surfaced against her, by charging her opponent with every false invective she could conjure, including racism, bigotry and misogyny. At the end of the day, however, when the dust of her ridiculous claims settled, questions about her integrity and truthfulness were what remained.

The evidence of an improper relationship between then-Secretary of State Clinton and the cash inflow into the Clinton Foundation, is today stronger than ever. The latest revelation, courtesy of the Associated Press, shows that at least 85 of the 154 people from private interests who met or had phone calls scheduled with then-Secretary Hillary Clinton, had donated or pledged money to the Clinton Foundation. And the sums are hardly de minimus. Those donors alone dropped as much as $156 million combined into the Foundation; potentially taking pay-to-play to a whole new level.

Despite assertions by some pundits that the best place to resolve those questions is the political arena, the appointment of a Special Prosecutor affords the only effective vehicle with which to drill down and get to the bottom of the mess candidate Clinton has left in her wake.

There is an urgency to initiating such an impartial investigation. Americans are slightly more than two months away from going to the polls to select a new president. They are entitled to have far more facts about Mrs. Clinton before making their choice than either the candidate or the current Administration has been willing to provide. And, despite the fact that a Special Prosecutor appointed now would very likely not conclude his or her investigation into this matter by November 8th, simply appointing such a person would give the voters the assurance that an impartial investigation will take place and ultimately result in the truth coming out.

In a sense, directing the Attorney General to appoint a Special Prosecutor would be a win for President Obama as well. Such a move would afford him a legacy he does not now appear destined to enjoy – that he is a President who cares more about impartial justice than protecting a political ally. The added benefit to Obama would be that he would then have washed his hands of the mess, and could no longer be pressed to discuss it since it would be in the hands of an independent, Special Prosecutor.

Allowing this scandal to fester will only further damage the credibility of our legal and political system. Just last week, a new word entered American’s vernacular: “Bleachbit,” meaning a service that prevents recovery of computer files. With trust in our Political Class at an all-time low, can we really afford further dissolution of the bond of trust between citizens and public officials that is essential to the proper functioning of our representative democracy?

Hillary may or may not stand to gain from a Special Prosecutor investigation, but America most definitely will.

by -
hack

The FBI is investigating another hack and before anyone knows the facts, the liberal media is already blaming Russia.

Somebody hacked into the email accounts of reporters at the New York Times and possibly other news organizations.

Within an hour of reports coming out of the hack Tuesday afternoon, CNN broke the news that it had reports that the Russians were to blame.

When the DNC was hacked last month just before their convention, Hillary and the other party leaders blamed Russia immediately as well.

There is no definitive proof that the hack even took place and CNN is already blaming Russia.

The New York Times didn’t confirm the attack and the FBI hasn’t made an official comment yet.

Despite the FBI and New York Times not speaking on the hack yet, CNN somehow already knows Russia is at fault.

Blaming Russia without evidence is something that Democrats are doing more and more often and that could be very bad for America. Especially if WikiLeaks’ founder Julian Assange is correct in his accusations that murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich was the one that leaked the DNC emails.

It is too early to blame Russia or anyone else for the hack, but by playing the blame game we are distracted that many journalists were hacked and who knows what information could be out there now.

What do you think of CNN blaming the Russians before there is any evidence?

by -
FBI

The FBI announced on Monday that they discovered another 15,000 of Hillary’s work related emails and she’s in trouble.

When the FBI started investigating Hillary’s home server back in 2014, Clinton turned over 30,000 emails that she said were work related.

Hillary deleted the emails she said were personal and turned over the rest, but now we know that to be a proven lie.

The FBI director Comey said they found an additional 7000 emails during the original investigation, but just yesterday they found 15,000 more.

To say that Hillary lied when she said all work related emails were turned over is an understatement. From what we know now, she only turned over about half and there could be more.

The FBI has an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Campaign and now investigating her time at State Department.

The agency just discovered the emails and we don’t even know what is inside them yet, but we know she lied.

Donald Trump did not waste anytime using attacking Hillary for her newly discovered emails.

In the past two weeks, we have seen a more calm and composed Donald Trump. He has made a dramatic pivot and continues to campaign at multiple stops everyday but Sunday.

Trump is hitting the trail hard while Hillary is taking three days off a week and constantly being proven a liar with her email scandals. Her foundation is under investigation and she is in real trouble.

If Trump can continue to campaign and speak like he has done the past two weeks and Hillary keeps messing up, then Donald could win this thing and win big.

Do you think these new email will hurt Hillary’s chances to become president? Let us know in the comments below.

TRENDING STORIES

When Donald Trump announced his pick for Secretary of Defense, a collective “Ooh-Rah!” was heard around the nation. The President Elect announced his choice as...