Tuesday, July 25, 2017


by -
gender identity
Don't worry we're here from the government to "help you"

Canada has passed a law that gives government the power to intervene in family life; if parents of children with gender identity issues refuse to accept their kids view on their own gender.

The Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act of 2017 (bill 89), was passed in Ontario with 63 to 23 votes.

Under this law, family judges and child services are urged to take a child’s “race, ancestry, place of origin, color, ethnic origin, citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression,” all under careful consideration, when determining whether or not a child shall remain with their parents.

The Minister of Child and Family Services, Michael Couteau, who played a key role in introducing the bill, stated that he would consider discrimination by parents on basis on gender identify as in fact “a form of abuse when a child identifies as one way and a caregiver is saying ‘No, you need to do this differently.’”

“If it’s abuse, and if it’s within the definition, a child can be removed from that environment and placed into protection where the abuse stops, he added.

Jack Fonseca, senior political strategist for the Campaign for Life Coalition noted, “with the passage of Bill 89, we’ve entered an era of totalitarian power by the state, such as never witnessed before in Canada’s history,” and that the new law is quite certainly a “threat” to people of faith.

“Make no mistake,” Fonseca added. “Bill 89 is a grave threat to Christians and all people of faith who have children, or who hope to grow their family through adoption.”

Fonseca questioned, “Why has the most powerful spiritual body in this province, the Catholic hierarchy, not lifted a finger nor raised a voice to oppose this tyranny against Christian families, and those from other faiths? The lack of spiritual leadership is killing us. Every single time that Liberals, either federally or provincially, roll out the LGBT juggernaut to take away our rights, or to demonize us as bigots, we hear nothing but silence from the Church. This has to stop.”

The new law shall require a parent or a legal guardian to “direct the child or young person’s education and upbringing in accordance with the child’s or young person’s creed, community identity and cultural identity.”

by -

Sara Kelly Keenan, the first person to receive a re-issued birth certificate from New York City with the gender “intersex,” instead of male or female, was seen leading a lobby that is actively making efforts to get legislators in California to pass a bill that would call for a third gender option on state documents.

Keenan has been noted saying that she has male genes, female genitalia, and mixed reproductive organs. “My body looks quite different from other women,” she said.

Carly Mitchell is another California resident who also identifies herself a “non-binary” has joined hands with Keenan to promote the concept and put pressure on the state authorities.

“Non-binary,” is the term that is suggested to be used for describing the third gender; as they do not fit into the standard definition of a male or a female, including those that identify as transgender, male and female or gender fluid.

The duo is very determined towards having California create a non-binary gender option for those that do not identify with either the male or female gender. They are looking forward to a bill that would allow California residents to select non-binary option on their birth certificates and on their drivers’ licenses.

“Having this license protects me from job discrimination, from imprisonment in many cases,” Mitchell said. “Society doesn’t understand that we exist.”

The attorney representing the activists was noted stating that although the pressure is immense and that even though the DMV is very supportive of the issue, they are still hesitant to issue the licenses with this new option.

“We’ve met with the Department of Motor Vehicles who is very supportive of providing this non-binary option,” attorney Toby Adams said.

On the other hand, Greg Burt, from the California Family Council expressed his views, “I don’t think people realize the implications on letting people pick what sex they are.” He added, “If you change sex to be a description of someone’s feelings, then anyone can claim to be a male or female.”

by -

Now that Bruce Jenner has come out as a woman, anyone can use a Target bathroom of their choice, and MMA men can fight as girls, even the United States military is falling in line with catering to “gender neutrality”.

The Navy and the Marines are preparing to change many of the military titles to more gender-neutral terminology. They are taking “men” out of the military.

Terms like “basic infantryman” are going to be switched to “basic infantry Marine”. In most cases, the word “men” or “man” will be replaced with Marine.

The Marines are changing 19 of their titles during this process.

For some reason though, “rifleman” and “mortarman” will not be altered.

Some of the females in the Air Force were asked about the terms and the changes, but very few of them thought they were necessary.

The change is coming during a national trend to get rid of all evidence of different genders.

Target recently removed all “boy” and “girl” colors and titles and now the toy sections are not gender specific.

Do you think we should change the names of the military positions to accommodate all genders?


Healthcare Horror

Despite the title of “Senate Majority Leader” prefixed to his name, Mitch McConnell has demonstrated little leadership in his approach to repealing Obamacare over...