Friday, October 21, 2016


by -

An earth-shattering report by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism found proof that the Pentagon paid a half a billion dollars to fake Al-Qaeda videos.

The BIJ found that the Pentagon paid a business in a foreign country to do the work.

U.K. based public relations firm, Bell Pottinger worked with the military to create fake news segments that looked and sounded like insurgents filmed them.

One employee of the company said that General David Petraeus signed off on a lot of the work, but occasionally approval came from the White House as well.

The operation to make the fake videos employed nearly 300 Iraqi and British workers all paid by the US government.

$540 million is a lot of money that could have been spent in America.

The PR firm claims that it only kept $15 million annually and the rest went to expenses and distribution.

One disturbing piece of information that came out in the report is that the PR firm helped to make propaganda videos and put them on discs that would be handed out in cities in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Those discs were coded in a way that Google Analytics could help figure out who is watching the video, where and the users IP address.

Not only is the government paying a foreign company to make fake propaganda video to be distributed in the Middle East, but they are tracking each person that views it.

The fact that Google is involved is another example how the tech giant has morphed into an important military asset.

What is still unclear is the president’s involvement. Was this his idea or did he just sign off on it and not really know what was going on?

If things were going really well in the Middle East nobody would question these kind of tactics, but things are not going well.

The money could have been spent better, obviously, but it wasn’t and now the Middle East is a bigger mess now than it was when Obama took office. Clearly he and the Pentagon need to come up with a new plan.

What do you think about Obama paying to make fake Al-Qaeda propaganda videos?

by -
google censoring

There are reports coming out that Google is changing people’s search results and auto-filling information to benefit Hillary Clinton.

There are also reports that Google’s email service, Gmail, is sending Trump campaign emails directly to users’ junk folders.

Here is a video about how the search engine is possibly changing the results to favor Hillary Clinton:

Are you a fan of Trump? Are his emails going into your spam or junk folder?

Take this quick poll to help us understand what is going on.

Is Google Censoring Your Account?

by -

When you go to Google you are looking for something. Millions of people search for movie times, macaroni and cheese recipes and of course, information on political candidates.

Google has been caught manipulating those search results in order to help out Hillary Clinton. How you might ask? Watch the video below as SourceFed breaks it down for us.

Crooked Hillary is up to it again.

When people searched for Hillary the auto complete was very friendly to Hillary. It left off things like her indictment or some of her other crimes and instead gave you search results for Hillary Indiana or about Hillary’s crime bill.

The magnitude of this manipulation can’t be measured, but one thing is for sure, many people at Google want Hillary to win.

Eric Schmidt, who runs Google’s parent company, is a big donor to Hillary. He also funds GroundWork, a group created to make sure that Hillary had the technology to win the election.

The Hillary campaign paid GroundWork $177,000 in the second quarter for their efforts in targeted outreach and data analytics.

There is more. Hillary’s chief technology officer is Stephanie Hannon and guess where she used to work? That’s right, Google.

There is no direct connection from Google to Hillary’s campaign and there is no evidence of any criminal activity.

The evidence that does exist shows some very unethical practices and incredible favoritism. It may not be illegal, but it definitely isn’t right.

Do you think that Hillary or Google should be held accountable for their actions in manipulating search results? Let us know in the comments below.



When Comey, the director of the FBI decided not to charge Hillary Clinton, it looks like it had more to do with money than...