Saturday, March 25, 2017

Hillary Clinton

by -
alt-left

Some liberals just can’t get past the fact that Donald Trump won, so they have created a fake universe where Hillary is president. Want to visit?

A fake news website has sprung up that pretends that Hillary is president and not Trump.

The site is a total fabrication, but publish articles that make the progressive left feel all warm inside.

Articles with headlines like, “Kellyanne Conway Dating Brock Turner” and “Mike Pence’s Latest Hobby: Gardening With Grindr Matches”. (Grindr is a dating website for those that don’t know.)

The articles take jabs at famous Republicans while create a safe space for liberals that are still in denial from Trump’s victory.

At the top of the home page it says, “President Hillary Rodham Clinton, News From The Real America, Where The Majority Rules.”

If you try to contact the site owners, there is a simple contact form, but no staff is identified.

Shortly after the election, Hillary spoke at the capital building about fake news.

Even though she called on government to end fake news, there is no report of Hillary trying to take down the HillaryBeatTrump website.

Thoughts? Comment below.

by -

Hillary Clinton has been quiet since her devastating loss back in November, but some are saying that her political career is not done.

There have been rumors that Hillary might run for Mayor of New York City, rumors the Clinton camp hasn’t officially silenced. A Hillary Clinton insider told the New York Post that Hillary is “50-50” on running for mayor of New York.

Hillary may not want to get out of politics yet, but what does the DNC think about that?

The DNC could be for the run since they have yet to apologize to the millions of Bernie Sanders fans that feel cheated by the Democratic National Committee from the information found in the DNC WikiLeaks.

The Party marginalized Bernie’s supporters in 2016 when it worked behind the scenes to support Hillary and torpedo Bernie. There are millions of Democrats that are still upset that Bernie didn’t the nomination.

Even with the shocking defeat on election day, the DNC doesn’t seem to be changing it’s course and neither does Hillary.

When Mitt Romney lost to Barrack Obama, he didn’t take to Twitter to throw jabs at the president. Neither did John McCain. Normally, when a candidate losses in a big election they remain quiet and resist the urge to take shots at their former rival. That is not the case for the latest Democrat candidate who might be eyeing a Hillary 2020 run.

When Trump’s executive order banning immigration from seven countries in the Middle East and Africa lost for a third time in court last week, Hillary took to Twitter to throw a jab. Some would call this trolling.

Is Hillary even out of campaign mode? Is she just taking a shot, or does she still have ambitions to square off with Donald one more time in 2020?

Politico and Huffington Post both published articles over the weekend that had Hillary 2020 in the title, and offered up reasons why they think Hillary could be contemplating another run.

Hillary, after all, never said in her concession speech that she would not run again. She left it open. If she ran again, she would be 73 years old, and in all fairness, Bernie was 74 when he ran this past year.

Hillary may have a desire to get back into politics, but is it a good idea? Hillary lost to Barrack Obama and to Trump. Two very different candidates handed Hillary two unexpected losses. She went into both elections as the clear favorite, but it never worked out. Maybe what she needs is to be the underdog, which she would most certainly be if she decided to run again. Or maybe the Democrats need to find a new winning solution that doesn’t include Hillary.

Do you think Hillary should run in 2020? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
democrat

Given the Democrats loss to Donald Trump in what was supposed to be a “sure thing” for Hillary Clinton, what do you think there next move will be?

 

 

by -

Jill Stein and Hillary Clinton called for a recount in Wisconsin and sure enough, Hillary is gaining ground in the futile attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 Presidential Election.

After the first full day of recounting the votes in Wisconsin, Hillary Clinton has gained one vote on Trump.

In November, Trump won Wisconsin by only one percent or roughly 22,000 votes. Apparently that was too close for Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate who finished fourth in the state with 30,980 votes, as she raised money and pushed for the recount.

The first results have come in from the recount and in Menominee County, the recount found 17 votes for Jill Stein that were not counted. Gary Johnson had 12 more people support him than originally.

So far, Clinton and Trump had one and two votes removed respectively.

Hillary still has a long way to go if she wants to try and win in a recount, but she narrowed the gap by one vote so far.

Back in 2000 when Florida held a recount, the original vote had the two candidates only 500 votes away from each other.

Out of almost six million votes, Bush won by less than 500. When it is that close, of course we should recount.

Wisconsin has less than half the total number of voters that Florida had in 2000 and Trump won Wisconsin by over 20,000 votes. Yet, the recount goes on.

There is no possibility that the recount will actually change the election results, and Hillary will not become the president all of a sudden.

The disturbing part of this whole story is the Democratic Party and Hillary chastised Trump when he said he wouldn’t automatically accept the results of the election. They attacked him because they thought they would win. They didn’t win and now the DNC and Hillary are all doing the same thing they criticized Trump for talking about.

Keep checking back to Liberty News Now as we continue updates on the recount.

Why do you think that Hillary is supporting the recount? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
Hillary Clinton after the 2016 election.

We have not heard much from Hillary after she lost the most incredible election in modern history, but now she surfaces to reach a new low.

Hillary Clinton is now joining the Green Party’s Jill Stein in an effort to do a recount in several battleground states.

Right now a recount of the votes is happening in Wisconsin after Jill Stein raised enough money to have a recount.

Hillary Clinton’s campaign said over the weekend it would be involved and help in the recount efforts.

The campaign probably doesn’t remember this video where Hillary spoke about the reasons why Trump should accept the election results.

It is easy to tell people to accept the results when you think you are going to win. She didn’t win and now is going against all her own advice and supporting the recount.

Wisconsin started the recount by hand today. Jill Stein and her team are working on getting recounts in Pennsylvania and Michigan as well.

The election ended with Trump having 306 electoral votes. He needed 270 to win.

If for some reason, the states come back with a different result on the recount, then Hillary could become the president.

Pennsylvania has 20 electoral votes, Michigan has 16 and Wisconsin has 10. If the vote was reversed in all three, then that would leave Trump with 260 electoral votes and it would give Hillary the win.

If Trump retained any one of the three states und recount, he will remain the president elect.

Hillary’s hypocrisy shines even after losing the first time election, but hopefully after this recount, this will be the last time she will lose this election.

Do you think Hillary has a chance to win in the recount? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
hillary

Just two weeks ago, Hillary went from being one of the most powerful people in the world to losing the presidency and it keeps getting worse for the former Secretary of State.

The Clinton Foundation is not raising money like it once had, and it could get a lot worse.

In 2014, the year before Hillary announced her run for the White House, the Clinton Foundation raised $172 million and she earned $3.6 million making speeches.

In 2015, she announced her run and the Clinton Foundation lost 37% in donations by only raising $108 million and getting paid $357,500 for speeches.

Currently we are in 2016 and the Clinton Foundation came under fire from the Trump Campaign and there is a criminal investigation going on in the FBI right now about Hillary’s ties to the foundation and the State Department.

The Clinton Foundation was the subject of many WikiLeaks emails that had a tremendous negative affect on Hillary’s public perception. WikiLeaks didn’t help Bill or Chelsea too much either. It can’t be good for the Clinton brand.

We are just learning the numbers for 2015, and it will be a while until we really know how bad the Clinton Foundation dropped this year.

With so much airtime and column inches dedicated to the criminal activity of the Clinton Foundation and Hillary’s subsequent loss, it wouldn’t be much of a surprise if the Clinton Foundation changed its strategy and downsizes.

The prevailing thought inside the Democratic Party is that Obama is going to pardon Hillary on his way out of office.

Obama might be able to keep Hillary out of prison, but if that happens, the Clinton Foundation will lose a lot of the credibly, power and any prestige it still has left.

The only hope for the future of the Clinton Foundation is to begin to push Chelsea into the spotlight and towards positions of power.

Hillary and the Clinton’s have their future up in the air right now. They never planned for this. They thought they would be filling the new Hillary administration with Clinton Foundation donors right now. They are just trying to figure out what to do next and their only option to save their empire may be Chelsea.

Do you think the Clinton Foundation will continue to function five years from now? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

by -
hillary lost

Not only did Donald Trump win the presidency and Hillary lose, there is another huge loser that nobody is talking about.

Can we take a moment to talk about how awful the corporate media and the polls turned out to be?

It’s really embarrassing.

Thousands and thousands of people make great livings reporting on the news for the corporate media and none of them got it right. Nobody.

Nobody on MSNBC, nobody on CNN, and nobody on Fox came out before the election to say Trump would win in a potential Electoral College landslide.

Every poll was off and the constant reporting about how Hillary would walk away with the election was so wrong that this is being called the greatest upset in American political history.

Fox News is part of the corporate media and the establishment on the right and they finally realized around 3am that they got it all wrong and Trump was right.

The media got it so wrong that Alex Jones made better predictions than CNN. For weeks, the InfoWars leader said the polls were rigged and Trump is winning in a lot of states, but the corporate media just mocked him.

Who is laughing now, Washington Post?

This was an amazing election because the people we trust to give us factual news with insightful commentary had it so wrong that they may never recover.

The big loser tonight, other than Hillary, is most definitely the corporate media. I you watched any of the MSNBC or CNN coverage, you could see it on their faces– if you could look past all the egg.

Other than Hillary, who do you think the big losers of the night are? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
russia
"Hillary Clinton" by Tim Pierce (licensed CC-BY-2.0)

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, had an interview where he spoke about the sources for Hillary’s emails and it isn’t Russia.

Hillary stood on the Debate stage and told the world that “17 intelligence agencies” have concluded that Russia is to blame for the hacks that has sent her campaign into a tailspin this year.

Every Democrat deflects the WikiLeaks questions by saying that Russia stole the information, but that doesn’t seem to be true.

The official statement from the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence have stated that Russia is the culprit, but are they?

Read the statement below and see that there is no evidence at all to confirm Russia’s involvement. The statement says that the methods of the hacking were “consistent” with Russian methods, but nothing concrete.

“The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.”

Not only did the intelligence agencies not confirm Russia’s involvement, they blamed Russia for something they may not be involved in.

If we listen to Julian Assange in his most recent interview, he says that Russia is not the source.

If Russia isn’t the source, then who is?

We don’t know for sure, but there are a lot of people who are saying that Seth Rich, the DNC staffer killed while walking home in DC is most likely the one who leaked the emails.

Lobbyists, WikiLeaks and others have offered a cash reward to information on Seth Rich’s death. The donated rewards are over $140,000 now. Some people believe that Seth Rich is the one that leaked it and they are willing to put their money where their mouth is.

The one thing we do know is that Russia has denied any involvement and we don’t have any evidence that they are to blame.

Democrats have done a good job in deflecting and trying to downplay the credibility of WikiLeaks, but the truth will come out. Unfortunately we won’t know until after this election.

Let us know if you think Russia hacked Hillary in the comments below.

by -
trump wins

The one thing that most liberals never considered is a Trump victory, but how will they respond to a if Trump actually wins?

Lets just pretend for a moment that liberals are tuned into MSNBC and CNN watching the election results and they start getting a sinking feeling.

They see the Electoral College numbers and Hillary doesn’t have as many as they thought she would. They watch Florida and North Carolina go to Trump and Hillary barely wins Virginia.

Then they really get worried when Michigan and Iowa go for Trump.

At this point, they take to Facebook and to Twitter to start talking about how Russia must be tampering with the numbers.

Then Hillary loses Texas and Utah and Colorado and all of sudden, real panic starts setting in. Trump is only a few states away from claiming victory and they realize for the first time that Trump could win.

They realize that Trump might win.

As the election drags on into the night, most will be to scared to watch the rest and go to sleep in their safe place with the hope that Hillary holds out.

They wake up to find Trump won the election and all hell breaks lose.

Facebook rants will be the first crack in the dam, but expect attacks in real life on Trump fans. Families will disown the Trump fans and every property Trump owns could be vandalized.

The people will turn to the talking heads on TV with no comfort. The networks are as baffled and angry as every other Hillary fan. The rivers will turn to blood and the stars will fall from the heavens.

Celebrities, who said they would move to other countries, actually do. Illegal immigrants will cry, liberal college students will need to seek counseling

Within a week there will be riots, and anyone celebrating a Trump win will be mocked and blamed for ruining this country. The liberals and Hillary’s crime family will go to the mattresses and they will attack and blame anyone they can.

Obama will be upset and he won’t go out and blame people like everyone else, he will just make Trump’s transition to the White House as painful and difficult as possible.

It will be a mess, and it will be the “tolerant” liberals that make it that way.

But to play devil’s advocate, what if Hillary wins, what will the Trump fans do?

Not much. Most Trump fans are voting for him to stand against the corruption of Hillary Clinton and the Democrats, but they also know that Hillary isn’t above cheating to win this election. Any rational Trump fan understands that Hillary is likely going to win if she gets the votes or not.

How do you think it will play out? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
obama

Obama looks like he has completely given up a couple of months from the end of his term by now saying that Illegals can vote.

Yes you read that right, Obama basically told illegal immigrants that it is ok to vote like a citizen and nobody will come and get you.

Don’t believe me? Watch the video where Obama actually says it.

(Sorry for the crude video, it’s the only one we could find.)

This kind of talk is worrisome coming from the person who is sworn to defend our Constitution.

Non-citizens cannot vote in the general election anywhere. That is the law.

Hearing the president talk about letting illegal, Hispanic non-citizens vote, then that Hispanics are breaking all records for early voting should make you worried for the voting process in this country.

We have enough problems with this election and we don’t need Obama telling people who are not legally allowed to vote to cast a ballot.

Apparently that whole, “They go low, we go high” thing is just for speeches.

Do you think there is anything that Obama won’t do to help Hillary win? Let us know in the comments below.

TRENDING STORIES

In his book, Men in Black, Mark Levin wrote, "Judicial activists are nothing short of radicals in robes--contemptuous of the rule of law, subverting...