Thursday, June 29, 2017

Illegal immigrants

by -

Last week, the Sacramento City Council voted to establish a taxpayer funded network to help illegal immigrants. The council voted unanimously to allot a sum of $300,000 of taxpayer money for the establishment of this network. It is noted, that taxpayer money shall be used to create a legal network which would help in shielding illegal immigrants from deportation, under President Donald Trump.

The network shall consist of legal, educational and faith-based nonprofit groups, all to assist the illegal immigrants. Sacramento Bee has reported, the main idea behind the network would be to not only provide legal assistance to fight deportation, but also to help “protect children and assets if parents are deported.”

The funds for this network are set to be made available as soon as next month.

Councilman Eric Guerra said, “The reality is there is a lot of fear … we can alleviate that fear.”

According to Guerra, illegal immigrants are entitled to assistance from the city, because they also contribute to our local economy and often pay local taxes, such as sales and property tax.

Sacramento Mayor Darrell Steinberg acknowledged how many would be disappointed by the results of the meeting, but “we are not a city that will exchange people’s civil rights for money,” he said.

He justified his decision by citing a study that indicated that illegal immigrants contribute nearly $60 million to Sacramento County governments each year.

Sacramento Bee noted, “About 49,000 Sacramento residents are not U.S. citizens, including about 4,100 children, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. That’s about 10 percent of city’s residents. How many are here illegally is unknown. The census bureau does not ask about legal status. Steinberg said immigrants with violent criminal records would not be eligible for aid, but those with minor offenses such as DUIs or possession of marijuana would. ‘The line, to me, is people who are a threat,’ Steinberg said. “

It is no surprise that local residents were not shy of voicing their opposition to the move.

Jennifer Garets, a board member of Sacramento Republican Women Federated, said, “I think it’s disgusting …. I don’t think that taxpayer money should be used to support this. I’d rather it be given to the homeless.”

This concept of using taxpayer funds to assist illegal immigrants is not at all a new idea in California. San Francisco, Oakland, Los Angeles and other major California districts have passed somewhat similar measures.

by -
Underground Railroad

Californians are building a new Underground Railroad to fight Trump’s immigration laws, but is it really like the one from the 19th century that freed slaves?

Pastor Ada Valiente took CNN on a tour of a home in Los Angeles that she is refurbishing to welcome immigrants that are on the run from US Immigration and Custom Enforcement agents.

Valiente told CNN that he could see “three families” living in the house.

When asked about what will happen if I.C.E. does come knocking? She said, “I definitely won’t let them in. That’s our legal right. If they have a warrant, then they can come in.”

The house is part of a larger network of homes that is being called the new Underground Railroad by the corporate media. Californians are thinking they are doing the honorable thing, and they are, if non-criminal families were going to be on the run from immigration officers.

Unlike the Underground Railroad of the mid 19th century that helped slaves escape to the North, this modern day Underground Railroad is going to fight against federal agents searching for criminal illegal aliens.

In a memo that DHS released that outlined the new immigration crack down, it specifically says it wants to expedite the removal of criminal illegal immigrants and those that have been here less than two years.

See the DHS memos here.

If immigration does go after the criminals that are also illegal immigrants, then are the members of the new Underground Railroad just helping criminals?

Building the new Underground Railroad is just one step that Californians are taking to stand against Trump and his immigration policy designed to protect Americans and deport illegal immigrants that have committed felonies.

The USA Today reported earlier this month that a “sanctuary state bill” or Senate Bill 54 was introduced to make California the first sanctuary state.

Making California a sanctuary state would limit local law enforcement’s relationship with federal I.C.E. agents. State and local police would be restricted from helping with information and manpower to enact Trump’s immigration crackdown.

The only way to stop the federal agents from working in California is for the state to secede from the nation. The group called YesCalifornia is gaining ground on a petition to get 600,000 signatures in order to put a secession vote on the ballot in 2018.

The real question is, why is California fighting Trump so much on immigration when criminal illegal aliens are killing Californians? It makes no sense.

A felon and five-time deported illegal immigrant shot and killed Kate Steinly in San Francisco.

Nancy Pelosi, House Minority leader from California had to face a grieving mother when she asked about sanctuary cities after her son was tortured and killed by an illegal immigrant. See the tearful exchange below.

California is resisting Trump’s immigration crackdown and it is not the same as southern slaves, stolen from their homeland, attempting to free themselves by heading north. If the pastors built the new Underground Railroad through Mexico to help families get to the United States, then maybe.

But protecting people that came here on their own, illegally and who have committed crimes should not be compared to the brave men and women of the 19th century that organized the real Underground Railroad.

Thoughts? Comment below.

by -
illegal immigrants

With Election Day looming, some see it as their last chance to enter into America illegally if Donald Trump is elected president.

A flood of illegal immigrants has come into the country over the last couple of years, but this year has set all records.

Just the past couple of months, border patrol agents report a big increase in illegal crossings.

Right now it is like last call and those who can are literally running for the border.

Some people want to cross the border to make sure they are here before the wall is built if Trump wins, or before amnesty is handed out if Hillary wins.

The motivations behind the crossings are due to smugglers pushing extreme narratives to people looking to cross and telling them it is their last chance.

The false narrative is very effective right now and our border agents are claiming they are overwhelmed. Some of the agents on the ground are claiming 800 to 1,000 people being detained each night, and that is just one location in McAllen, Texas.

People wishing to cross over the border who don’t want to do it alone pay between $4,000 and $8,000 to smugglers for help.

No wonder the smugglers are telling everyone that this is their last chance.

The problem on our southern border is overwhelming.

Illegal immigration is something that Obama and his administration have actually encouraged by not doing anything to control our borders.

Obama has been responsible for a very large number of deportations, but those people can turn right back around and cross our border again.

Many people don’t really have any other option than to come to America, because their home countries are in such bad shape.

We should have a legal way to bring these people into our country instead of them paying $30,000 to cartels and smugglers to get their family of four across the border.

What do you think we should do with all the illegal immigrants in our country right now? Let us know in the comments below.

by -

The Obama Administration is doing everything they can to allow the Southern border to stay as open as possible.

Over the last few years a surge of hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants have flooded into the United States. Some are rapists and murders, and Obama is letting them go.

To be specific, The U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement agency works for Obama and they decided to release over 19,000 criminals instead of deporting them in 2015.

The criminals released were some of the worst of the worst.

– 208 Convicted of Murder

– 900 Convicted of Sex Crimes

– 12,307 Convicted of Drunk Driving

In all the over 19,000 criminals were convicted for over 60 thousand crimes. It just didn’t all happen in the Southwest either; every state was affected.

We have Americans serving years in prison for having an ounce of marijuana but we are letting illegal aliens who are murderers and rapists go free. No wonder Donald Trump is winning the GOP nomination.

Just this week the Border Patrol Chief said that there is a major surge happening right now on our Southern Border.

It is clear at this point that Obama is not going to do anything about this problem. Even though there are also reports that Mexican cartels are trying to help ISIS penetrate America through the border on Mexico.

This is not going away and with news like this continuing to be released, expect Donald Trump and his wall to be at the center of the political discussion this Fall.

by -
Military Base

A year after fierce opposition disrupted a contentious plan to use American military bases as shelters for illegal immigrants, the Obama administration is quietly working to make it happen and six facilities throughout the nation are currently being considered.

Under the plan the military installations would house droves of under-aged illegal immigrants, officially known as Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC), who have entered the country from Central America in the last two years. Most have come from El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras and they’re being relocated to states across the nation to make room for more in the overwhelmed Mexican border region.

Judicial Watch has covered the crisis extensively and in 2014 reported that a hangar at Ft. Bliss in El Paso, Texas was being covertly used as an illegal alien processing center for UACs. At the time the administration was under fire for using three military installations— Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Ventura County Naval Base in southern California and Ft. Still Army Base in Oklahoma—to process the barrage of illegal immigrant youths that had crossed into the U.S. through Mexico.

Now the administration has revived its controversial idea to house UACs in active military facilities. The Pentagon quietly notified lawmakers from the jurisdictions where the bases are located during the holidays when things are slow and many take vacation. One of them is Alabama Congresswoman Martha Roby, who like many of her colleagues is outraged. Roby has made the Department of Defense (DOD) notice, delivered via electronic mail, public. It’s signed by Matthew Rhoades, a legislative affairs policy chief to the Secretary of Defense, and says that six DOD facilities were being assessed this month for use “as a temporary shelter for unaccompanied children.”

The installations on the short list are Maxwell Air Force Base in Congresswoman Roby’s Alabama district, Tyndall Air Force Base in Florida, Grand Forks Air Force Base in North Dakota, Naval Support Activity in Pennsylvania, Hanscom Air Force Base in Massachusetts and Travis Air Force Base in California.

The Pentagon notice says that the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is “expanding its capacity to provide shelter for the current influx of Unaccompanied Children at the U.S. Southern Border.” An increase in shelter capacity is a prudent step to ensure ORR meets its “statutory responsibility” to provide the illegal immigrant youths with shelter, the document states.

Besides the military bases, HHS is also activating two federal facilities in the next few months to house UACs. The first is an 800-bed facility that will open in Homestead, Florida in February and the other is a 1,000-bed facility in Lakewood, Colorado that will begin taking UACs in April.

Roby has vowed to fight the plan to bring detained illegal alien minors to Maxwell-Gunter Air Force Base as she did a year ago when the administration first considered it as a UAC shelter. “This is a terrible idea,” the congresswoman writes in a Montgomery newspaper piece published this week. “Our active military installations have very important jobs to do,” Roby writes. “At Maxwell-Gunter, that includes things like training, education and cyber activities, many times in classified settings that are very sensitive. There’s no question in my mind that forcing our base to house and secure hundreds of illegal minors would negatively impact the mission. We cannot allow that to happen.”


by -

A year after freeing tens of thousands of illegal immigrants convicted of serious crimes, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is distorting annual deportation figures by falsely claiming the number of criminal aliens removed from the U.S. keeps increasing when in fact it’s shrinking drastically.

In fiscal year 2015 deportation figures released this week, DHS celebrates that its enforcement efforts prioritize criminals and threats to public safety as well as national security.

The agency created after 9/11 to keep the country safe claims the latest stats show “the number of convicted criminals removed from the interior continued to increase.” The reality is that deportations of criminal aliens declined 27% from last year—from 86,923 in 2014 to 63,127 in 2015.

This serious discrepancy was exposed by the Washington D.C.-based Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), which further reveals that the number of criminal deportations in fiscal year 2015 is less than half of what it was in 2011.

Not surprisingly, the total number of deportations has also dropped thanks to President Obama’s policies—including broad amnesty—limiting federal immigration authorities from initiating removal proceedings.

The latest DHS figures analyzed by CIS show total deportations in 2015 were one-third less than in 2011, before the Obama administration implemented its various initiatives to protect illegal aliens in the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) deported 25% less illegal immigrants last year than the previous year—from 315,943 in 2014 to 235,413 in 2015. Those figures include both border and interior cases. CIS also broke the numbers down by interior deportations and that number declined even more—31% from last year, from 100,114 in 2014 to 69,478 in 2015.

The figures are sure to drop further in the coming year, according to CIS Director of Policy Studies Jessica Vaughan, who recently testified at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing along with ICE Director Sarah Saldana. While Saldana expressed pride in her agency’s deportation numbers, Vaughan testified that they are abysmal.

“This willful neglect has imposed enormous costs on American communities,” Vaughan told lawmakers. “In addition to the distorted labor markets and higher tax bills for social welfare benefits that result from uncontrolled illegal immigration, the Obama administration’s anti-enforcement policies represent a threat to public safety from criminal aliens that ICE officers are told to release instead of detain and remove. The administration’s mandate that ICE focus only on the ‘worst of the worst’ convicted criminal aliens means that too many of ‘the worst’ deportable criminal aliens are still at large in our communities.”

Last year the Obama administration released 36,007 aliens convicted of 88,000 crimes from detention centers throughout the United States, according to breathtaking DHS records obtained by CIS. The crimes committed by illegal aliens released from federal custody include homicide, sexual assault, theft, kidnapping and alcohol-related driving convictions.

It’s unlikely that these undocumented convicts will ever get deported, at least not during the remainder of the Obama presidency. In the statement announcing the latest deportation figures DHS lays the foundation for even lower numbers in the future by warning of “changing migrant demographics” that impact removal operations.

This is a reference to the significant increase in Central Americans apprehended at the southwest border in recent years. “Higher numbers of Central Americans crossing our border require greater resources, as the removal process for this population takes more time, personnel resources, and funding to complete compared to the removal process for Mexican nationals,” DHS states.

“Additionally, many of these Central American nationals are asserting claims of credible or reasonable fear of persecution. Such cases require careful adjudication, and therefore, take longer to process. Early data indicates that some individuals have successfully obtained asylum in the removal proceedings process.”

by -
refugee killing

What happens when two liberal constituencies turn on each other?

In Sweden, it could result in death. Two teenage Muslim refugees from Morocco—aged 16 and 19—in Sweden beat a gay man to death.

The victim met the 16-year-old “refugee” in a park near is house, and invited him and his friend back to his apartment to give him clothes and food.

The teens then claimed that the man then tried to have sex with them—and that they only fought him off in self-defense.

But police recovered a video that showed a very different story.

The video, which was recovered from the 16-year-old’s cell phone, shows the gay man bloodied and tied up on the floor of the own apartment. The teens are heard screaming at the man, and shouting anti-gay obscenities at him. Clearly, not a fight that was done in self defense.

The attack was especially grotesque: after they bound him up and beat him to death, the Muslim teens apparently dressed the victim in women’s clothes in order to mock him, and wrapped a snake around his neck. When they were done, they untied him and put a blanket over his face.

Sweden allows hundreds of thousands of Muslim refugees into their country each year—and they’ve seen a skyrocketing amount of sexual violence ever since. More than 3 in 4 of Sweden’s rapists are immigrants from Muslim countries.

Muslim countries are among the most anti-gay in the world. Morocco, for instance, punishes being gay with up to three years in prison. Other Muslim countries have even more stringent punishments.

Some liberals are beginning to express concern that Muslim refugees have, in fact, a very deep hatred towards liberal values. Even the most socially conservative people in Western countries would find many of their values reprehensible, like the brutal attack in Sweden.

However, despite rising evidence that refugees pose a safety and security risk to Europe—and evidence that even second- and third-generation refugees don’t assimilate into European society—European leaders continue to allow Muslim refugees to pour into Europe unfettered.


North Korea

The twenty-two year old student passed away on Monday, in Ohio; only five days after he had returned from North Korea, after being detained...