Wednesday, December 7, 2016

Mall of America

by -
Black Santa at Mall of America

The largest mall in America is doing something that nobody expected, they are adding some color to their Santa Claus. Does it make a difference?

The Mall of America in Minneapolis has hired Santa Larry Jefferson from Dallas to be the official Santa Claus for the popular Santa Experience.

Santa’s suite is perfect down to the gold “Santa” belt buckle. His beard is a fluffy natural white and he has a wonderfully hearty “HO, HO, HO”!

In every way, Mall of America found the perfect Santa, but there is one minor change to tradition.

The Mall of America Santa Claus is black.

As expected, there are a lot of different opinions about a black Santa Claus online.

Some are very excited and think it is a good update of traditions.

Some are not so excited.

The owner of the Santa Experience is Landon Luther and he met Jefferson at a Santa Convention in Missouri. Of the 1000 participating Santa Claus’, only one was not white. That is the one that Landon hired.

How does Santa feel about it? “It’s no big deal, I’m still Santa. I just happen to be a Santa of Color,” said Jefferson.

To the kids, it isn’t a big deal, unless the kid is also black. For the children of color, their Santa Experience could be a little more special this year, and there is nothing wrong with that.

How do you feel about a black Santa? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

by -

It sounded awfully familiar. In late February a group calling itself al-Shabaab (operating out of Somalia) threatened to attack the Mall of America in Minnesota. It was kind of like déjà vu for me; I’d seen this before some place. Then it hit me. That was the plot of Stephen Hunter’s book Soft Target (Simon & Schuster, 2011)! The target: the Mall of America (or “America, the Mall” as it is called in Hunter’s book). The terrorists: Somali gunmen. The victims: hundreds of innocent American shoppers going about their daily lives and government officials who were powerless to stop the killing.

My first thought was “is this for real”, or was it some cheap attempt by some Islamic terrorist group to stir up some publicity but not smart enough to think up something original? Then it got me thinking more about the scenario—both the threatened one and the fictional one in Hunter’s book—and how I would deal with it if I was “in charge”.

Following the announcement of the threat, the news media began reporting on mall security. So just what security measures exist at shopping malls around the country?

The Mall of America is a “no guns” zone—it is private property as are most shopping malls and thus mall operators (and/or their insurance providers?) are able to decide whether to allow firearms on their property or not. Guns might scare the shoppers and a gunfight could break out at any moment…or so the thought process goes according to mall officials. Because the signs are posted, there couldn’t possibly be anyone that would enter the mall carrying a gun because they would be violating the law and could go to jail. …R-i-g-h-t-t-t!—like a sign has ever stopped any criminal/terrorist from taking action. Of course, the Mall of America is not alone in its “no guns” policy.

But malls have “security”! …R-i-g-h-t-t-t!… You mean that guy (or gal) barely out of their teens walking around in a uniform with a 2-way radio hanging off their belt? They are there just to help shoppers find their way around the mall, to reunite lost kids with their parents, or to call for assistance if something serious happens. Most are not allowed to carry firearms. They are not even police officers, but rather “private security” hired by the mall owners and thus they have no authority to act in a law enforcement capacity. And even if the mall has regular police officers assigned to it, how effective are they going to be when confronting multiple armed attackers coming into the mall from different directions? There are unlikely to be enough police officers assigned to a mall to control all of the entrances/exits and confront armed attackers that are probably already in the mall. They may have someone in a central control center that can view all of the entrances/exits and other areas of the mall on security camera feeds to a wall of monitors, but that only means they can tell someone what has happened, not prevent it from happening.

But…but…“we have lockdown procedures”. R-i-g-h-t-t-t!! Do you seriously think that “locking down” a shopping mall is going to help? All that does is keep the victims from escaping the terrorists! While schools may use lockdown to help protect the children and staff, malls are not configured anywhere like a school is. Instead of solid walls and thick doors into each room/store, there are large expanses of glass and maybe a security grating that is lowered to prevent entrance from central hallways in the mall when that store is closed. These are not designed to stop bullets or even hide those inside the store from being seen by those on the outside. Depending on this type of barrier would create a scenario of “shooting fish in a barrel”! In schools, people spend most of their time in the various rooms and only go into the central hallways for short periods of time to move from one classroom to another periodically throughout the day. In shopping malls there is constant movement between stores and a large percentage of the people in the mall are in the central hallways at any point in time. Also, schools practice their lockdown procedures so that students and staff know just what they are supposed to do. And while you could probably do a “lockdown drill” with the mall staff, how do you include customers into that when the customers are constantly changing (i.e. coming and going)?

So what can be done to keep armed terrorists from attacking a shopping mall? You have to prevent the terrorists from gaining entrance to the mall in the first place. Short of putting metal detectors/body scanners at every mall entrance—aka TSA-like airport security—there is not much that can be done to stop them from getting into the mall. Signs certainly won’t do it! Airport-like security would be extremely expensive to implement and it is not something that a mall operator is going to undertake. Once terrorists are inside the mall, they have the advantage and time will be on their side, not on the side of first responders trying to remove them.

The brand of terrorists that the world faces today are not afraid of dying. Indeed, that is their ultimate goal, but they want to take as many victims with them as possible when they do die. In September 2013, terrorists attacked the Westgate Mall in Nairobi, Kenya. There it took the police and army so long to get organized that armed citizens took it upon themselves to intervene to confront the terrorists and rescue as many victims as possible. In the end, 72 people died when government officials moved to regain control of the mall. Of that number, five were terrorists and another six where Kenyan soldiers. The rest were civilians that happened to be at the mall when the terrorists struck. Over 175 people were wounded. And oh by the way, it was the same al-Shabaab group that claimed credit for this mall attack.

The only thing the terrorists fear is failure. They fail when they are unable to achieve the “body count” they desire and to cause panic. By taking down the “no guns” signs and allowing armed citizens to carry concealed firearms in shopping malls, you significantly change the probability the terrorists will be successful. Now the terrorists won’t know how many armed opponents they may have to face as they carry out their acts. And they won’t know who is an armed opponent/threat because those citizens will not be wearing uniforms but will be dressed like everyone else is. Doing this costs the mall operators and store owners virtually nothing to implement but also greatly lowers the threat posed to their continued livelihood that would occur if the terrorists are able to successfully launch an attack. I would think the insurance companies would come to the same realization.

by -
Mall of America Black Lives Matter

Bloomington, Minnesota City Attorney Sandra Johnson is expected to file criminal charges against the organizers of a massive protest that took place at the Mall of America last Saturday afternoon over the deaths of Michael Brown of Ferguson, MO and Eric Garner of New York, NY at the hands of police officers during arrest.

In all, approximately 3,000 individuals attended the protest that partially shut down the mall for about two hours at the height of the Christmas shopping season driving away customers and causing financial damage to the affected stores during the highly charged standoff.

Using social media including Facebook and Twitter, a protest mob converged on the center of the mall to chant “Black Lives Matter”, “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot” and “While you’re on your shopping spree, black people cannot breathe” knowing the protest would be highly visible at a commercial center located on private property.

To determine the amount of financial damage suffered by the protest, Mall officials collected estimates of how much money the stores lost on that Saturday and combined that total with the amount of overtime put in by police to monitor the protest and quell unrest.

Johnson said the number would be “staggering” and that she wants the protest organizers to pay.

An employee at one of the affected stores said ”you had people yelling and screaming inside the mall that wanted out and you had people yelling and screaming outside the mall that wanted in.”

“This was a powder keg just waiting for a match,” said Johnson who is now building criminal cases against the protest organizers. “The main perpetrators are those who continued on their Facebook site to invite people illegally to the Mall of America,” she said.

Lena Gardner of the group “Black Lives Matter” said several groups took part in organizing Saturday’s protest and that financial losses were not the fault of protesters instead blaming police who shut down the mall.


Megyn Kelly has become a huge star in cable news and the number one network, Fox News, may lose their number one female anchor. Today,...