Saturday, October 22, 2016


by -

A new study by the Columbia Journalism Review has reported that the relationship between the White House and the press is the least open it’s ever been–and that’s coming directly from frustrated journalists themselves.

After what CJR describes as an “exhaustive study of every official exchange Obama had with the press corps in 2014,” as well as interviews with a number of current and former White House correspondents, they’ve discovered that the Obama Administration is working hard to hide many of its actions from the press.

In 2014, Obama gave just five solo press conferences. By comparison, John F. Kennedy held 23 press conferences per year during his term as President.

High-profile White House correspondents are becoming increasingly vocal about their frustration with a secretive administration.

Peter Baker, a White House correspondent for The New York Times, even admits, “The people who cover the president know him the least.”

And U.S. News and World Report’s Kenneth Walsh, who has been a White House correspondent since the Reagan Administration, agrees: “Something really important has gone missing, understanding the president and having both sides trust each other enough so [the press] understands what’s going on. We don’t understand him as well as we should, and I think the country loses because of that.”

This is a far cry from the often-fawning press attention that Barack Obama would receive during his successful 2008 campaign for President–when talking heads like MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, who famously claimed to get a “thrill up [his] leg” during an Obama speech–and could serve as a turning point in the notoriously-favorable press attention Obama has received in the past.

In the meantime, Obama and his Administration shows little signs of fixing their relationship with the press–which means journalists and Americans alike can continue to expect the same stonewalling and hidden agendas that have defined the last six years.

by -
CNN Rights

In a rare public display of candor by a liberal icon, CNN host Chris Cuomo blurted out – during a heated exchange with Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore on the issue of gay marriage, the Constitution and state’s rights – that “Our rights do not come from God”… “They come from man”…“from collective agreement and compromise.”

Cuomo was silent on how the people would reach “collective agreements” and who would negotiate “compromises” but one can assume that he would be among the elites involved by virtue of credentials as liberal news media icon.

Cuomo, who is a lawyer in addition to being a “journalist”, should know that the Founders held God and the role He plays in the human condition in high esteem considering they began the great American experiment with these words found in the opening sentences of the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness –That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed…”

Too late to take it back though. The ideologically leftist cat was out of the progressive bag. In an article published in last Friday’s edition of The New American, Selwyn Duke writes that:

Cuomo “seems to be confusing ‘laws’ with ‘rights’ . . . If our rights are from God, they exist apart from governmental laws, which man does create . . . These rights are secured by government via the creation and enforcement of just law” . . . “Why did the Founders emphasize rights’ divine origin? Because He (or he) who giveth can also taketh away.

“The same is true of marriage…the long-held position in Christendom . . . that a man and woman were joined in matrimony by God…Once we began to believe marriage was a human creation . . . divorce become easy and marriage is redefined.

This may be why same-sex marriage opponents cite the First Amendment as the law that informs their position on marriage. The amendment says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”

So when federal courts – an equal branch of government that must operate within the four corners of the Constitution – decide to trump state law or the will of the People expressed at the ballot box through referendums and state constitutional amendments, the People might come to the conclusion that the courts do so without the consent of the governed.

In light of this, some say that Chris Cuomo, who owes his livelihood as CNN Anchor to the freedom of press clause of First Amendment, might want to revisit the issue of rights bestowed on him by God not man.



When Comey, the director of the FBI decided not to charge Hillary Clinton, it looks like it had more to do with money than...