Thursday, October 20, 2016


by -
NSA Hacked

There are reports coming out that the NSA was recently hacked and coincidentally Edward Snowden fell off the map and was presumed dead.

Online, hackers who say they broke into the NSA and took an incredible amount of information are trying to sell the secrets to the highest bidder.

The hackers reportedly posted some secret documents online for free to serve as an example that they were able to get access and retrieve information.

What could be the magnitude of the hack? Former NSA employee and now CEO of a public security firm that deals with similar security issues, Dave Aitel said this about the potential hack.

“It’s at minimum very interesting; at maximum, hugely damaging. It’ll blow some operations if those haven’t already been blown.”

Aitel is suggesting that the hacked information could put operations and operational personnel in danger. If the information leaked threatens the lives of the agents in the field then the hackers could be in a lot more trouble if caught.

One theory that has surfaced recently is that the infamous whistleblower, Edward Snowden, fell off the grid and worked with other hackers to break into the NSA.

Just as the news broke about the NSA hack, Edward Snowden sent a tweet to let is fans know that the rumors of his death were not true. But why did it take a week after his girlfriend claimed he was dead to clear that up?

Right now we don’t officially know that the NSA was hacked, if there was any damaging information taken and if Snowden had anything to do with it.

What we do know is Snowden is not dead, the NSA probably was hacked and that someone that claims to have hacked the NSA is trying to sell information.

When dealing with the secrets of intelligence agencies, don’t expect the news to be very forthcoming, but keep checking back with Liberty News Now for updates.

Let us know below if you think the NSA was hacked and if Snowden had anything to do with it.

by -

The upcoming Hollywood movie, Snowden, about traitor Edward Snowden—criminally charged by the U.S. government under the Espionage Act—portrays the National Security Agency (NSA) subcontractor who leaked top secret information as a courageous patriot. Nothing surprising there considering the film’s Academy award-winning director, Oliver Stone, referred to Snowden as a “hero” back in 2013 when he fled to Moscow to avoid prosecution after betraying his country. Snowden’s illegal disclosures have helped terrorist groups like Al Qaeda and led to the death of innocent people. Last year Snowden began openly engaging with ISIS and Al Qaeda members and supporters via social media.

“Snowden has done incalculable damage to the NSA and, in the process, to American national security,” according to University of Virginia Law School Professor Robert F. Turner, who specializes in national security issues and served as Counsel to the President’s Intelligence Oversight Board at the White House.

“Officials in position to know said good people have already lost their lives thanks to Snowden. Countless more are likely to lose theirs now that our enemies know our most closely guarded sources and methods of communications intelligence collection.” Turner adds that Snowden is hailed as a hero and “whistleblower” by those who are clueless to the devastation he’s done. “When all of the smoke clears, it may very well be proven that Snowden is the most injurious traitor in American history.”

This would make it illegal to profit from his crimes and the Department of Justice (DOJ) should confiscate all money made by the violators. Snowden is no whistleblower. In fact he violated his secrecy agreement, which means he and his conspirators can’t materially profit from his fugitive status, violation of law, aiding and abetting of a crime and providing material support to terrorism.

It’s bad enough that people are profiting from Snowden’s treason, but adding salt to the wound, the Obama administration is doing nothing about it. Judicial Watch has launched an investigation and is using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to obtain records. True whistleblowers and law-abiding intelligence officers such as Lt. Colonel Anthony Shaffer, FBI Special Agent Robert G. Wright and Valerie Plame got release authority in accordance with their secrecy agreement and did not seek money or flee to Russia.

A federal appellate court has ruled that government employees, such as Snowden, who signed privacy agreements can’t profit from disclosing information without first obtaining agency approval. The case involved a CIA agent (Frank Snepp) who violated his agreement with the agency by publishing a book. A federal court denied Snepp royalties from his book and an appellate court upheld the ruling, reiterating that the disgraced agent breached the “constructive trust” between him and the government.

Furthermore, Snowden, Stone and the producers of a 2014 Oscar-winning Snowden film titled “Citizenfour” may be in violation of the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), which forbids providing material support or resources for acts of international terrorism. Many deep-pocketed institutions have been sued under the law for providing terrorist organizations or affiliates resources that assisted in the commission of terrorist acts.

Just last month the families of victims killed and injured by Hamas filed a $1 billion lawsuit against Facebook under ATA for providing the terrorist group with material support by letting it use its services to help carry out attacks. A number of banks have also been sued under the law for financing terrorist activities, albeit unknowingly.

Both Stone and “Citizenfour” director Laura Poitras had clandestine meetings abroad with Snowden. Stone told a Hollywood trade publication he met Snowden in Russia and that he moved production overseas because filming in the U.S. was too risky. “We didn’t know what the NSA might do, so we ended up in Munich, which was a beautiful experience,” Stone said. Poitras actually collaborated with Snowden’s defection to China then Russia and had email communication with him before he committed his crimes so she had foreknowledge.

This is all included in her documentary. On May 20, 2013 Snowden flew to Hong Kong to meet with British journalists and Poitras. He gave them thousands of classified documents and Poitras became known as the woman who helped Snowden spill his secrets, or rather commit treason. When Citizenfour won the 2015 Academy Award, Poitras was joined by Snowden’s girlfriend during her acceptance speech at the Dolby Theater in Hollywood, California. “The disclosures that Edward Snowden revealed don’t only expose a threat to our privacy but to our democracy itself,” Poitras said in her acceptance speech. “Thank you to Edward Snowden for his courage and for the many other whistleblowers.”

Snowden remains a fugitive from U.S. law protected by Russia. On June 14, 2013, federal prosecutors charged him with “theft of government Property,” “unauthorized communication of national defense information” and “willful communication of classified communications intelligence information to an unauthorized person.” Al Qaeda keeps using information leaked by Snowden to help its fighters evade surveillance technology, according to a British newspaper report. “The terrorist group has issued new video guidance based on what they have learnt about Western spying methods from the Snowden disclosures which have been made public on the internet,” the article states. “The move confirms the worst fears of British and American intelligence chiefs who warned that Snowden’s betrayal would play into the hands of the terrorists. The video even uses footage of news reports of the Snowden leak, highlighting how ‘NSA is tracking millions of phones.’”

In Other Edward Snowden News – “Snowden Missing And Feared Dead”

Watch the trailer for Snowden below.

by -
Edward Snowden

Somehow, no mainstream media outlet is covering the news of Edward Snowden’s disappearance and that he is thought to be dead.

Edward Snowden became the source of the largest security breach in American intelligence history when he took 1.7 million documents from the NSA.

What makes this story even more unique is that around the time the rumors of his death started, Snowden sent a very mysterious tweet.

People think that the tweet could be a dead-man’s switch. An tweet programmed to go out if Snowden didn’t login within a specific amount of time. But is the tweet just gibberish?

It looks like Snowden sent a key that could potentially unlock a treasure trove of NSA documents given to many different reporters all around the world. The reporters were given a file they could not access without the 64-character key, and Snowden said it would only be released upon his death.

The mysterious tweet could be the key that was sent out over Twitter.

The story takes a unique twist when the tweet disappears and the next thing we hear about Snowden came from a woman that claims to be the whistleblower’s mistress.

She said this when confronting whom we think is Snowden’s girlfriend. Translated from Russian to English.

Natasha, you b*tch. You had no right to inform someone about the death of my dear Edward. You’re a wh*r*. Is not it enough for you that you cheated? Slept with my husband? It was my place to break the news – news must be broken. Shame on you wh*r*.”

We do not know for sure who was dating whom, because Russian reporting on this topic has been sketchy at best.

What we do know is that Snowden’s Twitter has gone silent except for another cryptic tweet to the NSA that said, “It’s time”.

Time for what? Does this mean that the remaining files that Snowden did not release to the public will be released soon?

There are a lot of questions surrounding Snowden right now, like is he officially dead or not? What information has Snowden not released? What connection does it all have to Hillary?

We don’t have many answers, but we know that it isn’t looking good for Snowden or the NSA.

Do you think Snowden is a hero or a traitor? Let us know in the comments below.

by -

It’s a good day for privacy advocates: the National Security Agency stopped its most controversial surveillance program, effective last Sunday.

NSA’s practice of gathering phone records from just about every American has been tossed out, and will be replaced by a more targeted method of surveillance.

The program had gathered “metadata” from virtually all phone calls–essentially, information about who called what phone number at what time–but, contrary to popular belief, did not actually record the content of those phone calls.

The data collection–which was first revealed to the American public in the leaks published by former NSA contractor, Edward Snowden, almost three years ago–caused outcry and surprise on both sides of the aisle, citing privacy concerns and unreasonable behavior on the part of the NSA.

Faced with increased controversy, Obama called a presidential review committee to investigate the NSA’s data collection.

The committee revealed that the bulk surveillance of the American public actually did not lead to any breakthroughs in the fight against terrorism.

Deemed ineffective, the stage was set for a change in policy.

Now, NSA analysts must get a court order in order to obtain phone call metadata, which puts it much more in line with constitutional protects against unreasonable search and seizure.

The NSA will continue to keep its metadata records from the last five years until February 29, 2016, at which point it will purge all its records.

by -

Hidden away in President Barack Obama’s first term legislative achievements – somewhere between ObamaCare and his $700 billion drunken sailor stimulus spending law – was the creation of a new federal agency with the nice sounding name “Consumer Financial Protection Bureau” (CFPB).

The president wanted to create the “consumer protection” agency to do what other federal agencies already do only better – protect consumers from themselves. On the surface, the CFPB says it is:

“A 21st Century agency that helps consumer finance markets work by making rules more effective, by consistently and fairly enforcing those rules, and by empowering consumers to take more control over their economic lives.”

We have 20th Century bureaucracies that say they do this but who’s counting.

The difference between the old and new has to do with the access the CFPB has to the personal finances of all Americans. It has access to their mortgage payments and details, credit card statements and details, auto loan payments and details – in effect anything you own and details.

The news media and politicians fret about the NSA’s domestic spying program, whether the government can scoop up meta data of all the people you call, when and for how long and the gathering face recognition, retina scans, fingerprints and other biometric data on the people by the government but not a word about government intrusion on the financial lives of all Americans.

What people don’t know and what a new polls reveals is that people recoil in anger when they learn that, under CFPB rules, the government is collecting identifiable financial data of each American that gives government bureaucrats an intimate picture of a person’s financial status at any point in time.

If the CFPB teams up with the Internal Revenue Service, ObamaCare, the U.S. Census Bureau, the National Security Agency (NSA), the Federal Communications Commission’s recent takeover of the Internet and the U.S. banking system and there is no part of your life that you own.

Your privacy is not just dead. It’s buried.

The poll, conducted by the U.S. Consumer Coalition (USCC), a grassroots organization that works to protect consumers’ rights to access free-market goods and services, is the first national survey about the CFPB and how Americans feel about the agency once they find out what it does.

The poll showed that an overwhelming majority of Americans want to see the CFPB subject to congressional oversight through the appropriations process.

“Americans have spoken loudly for the first time in this survey that they believe this agency is invading their privacy and restricting their freedom of choice in a way that makes them very uncomfortable,” said Brian Wise, Senior Advisor to the U.S. Consumer Coalition.

According to a press release, the USCC commissioned the nationwide survey of 3,225 likely voters and 3,604 adults to better understand how Americans feel about the CFPB. Key Findings of the USCC-Zogby Analytics Poll include:

• A majority (55%) of respondents believe the CFPB’s data collection program is similar or worse than the controversial NSA monitoring program.

• Only 20% of those polled believed that the CFPB should be able to collect and review Americans’ credit card statements without their knowledge.

• 78% of respondents believe the CFPB should have to seek Congressional approval for its budget like other agencies.

• Nearly 70% of those polled believe that the government should not be able to tell consumers how to spend their money or make financial decisions for their families.

• 71% agreed that it is the consumer’s responsibility to determine whether or not to take out loans and mortgages with unfavorable terms as long as they are presented clearly.

“We have a powerful agency unilaterally regulating products and industries while subjecting Americans to an unprecedented invasion of their personal financial data. And it’s clear Americans don’t like it,” said Wise.

“They clearly oppose the agency’s activities to invade their privacy, track their purchases, and efforts to tell them what products they can and cannot use.”

Continuing from the release:

“The CFPB has come under fire in recent months for proposing controversial regulations of consumer financial products without congressional approval. The CFPB instituted a program to acquire and monitor the purchases of more than 500 million credit cards of American consumers.

The CFPB has also refused to provide information to Congress on the purpose of the data collection program, or agree to allow Americans an opportunity to opt-out.”

“Consumers are increasingly against the government telling them how to spend their money and are skeptical of the claim that mountains of their personal data are needed to keep them safe – not from terrorists in this case – but from themselves and their own choices.

USCC hopes that this survey will raise awareness about a number of the questionable activities of the CFPB and serve as a catalyst for real reform to protect America’s consumers from the so-called ‘consumer protector.'”

Based on these findings, Americans are sending a clear message to Congress, the President and the bureaucracies he controls – BUTT OUT!

by -

Online free encyclopedia, Wikipedia–one of the most visited websites in the world–is suing the NSA over violating the First and Fourth Amendments.

Wikipedia founder, Jimmy Wales, announced the lawsuit in a scathing op-ed in The New York Times earlier this week.

“Today, we’re filing a lawsuit against the National Security Agency to protect the rights of the 500 million people who use Wikipedia every month,” said Wales. “We’re doing so because a fundamental pillar of democracy is at stake: the free exchange of knowledge and ideas.”

Wales alleges that the NSA’s mass surveillance of the Internet–as exposed last year by former NSA contractor and whistleblower, Edward Snowden–violate the right to privacy in the Fourth Amendment, as well as freedom of expression in the First Amendment.

Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia–meaning that tens of thousands of volunteers online, mostly anonymous, are the ones who write and edit Wikipedia entries. Wales feels that, because of interference from the NSA, the U.S. Government is dramatically curtailing constitutionally-protected freedom.

Wales cites a specific example of the NSA’s “chilling effect” on free speech:

“During the 2011 Arab uprisings, Wikipedia users collaborated to create articles that helped educate the world about what was happening. Continuing cooperation between American and Egyptian intelligence services is well established; the director of Egypt’s main spy agency under President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi boasted in 2013 that he was ‘in constant contact’ with the Central Intelligence Agency.

So imagine, now, a Wikipedia user in Egypt who wants to edit a page about government opposition or discuss it with fellow editors. If that user knows the NSA is routinely combing through her contributions to Wikipedia, and possibly sharing information with her government, she will surely be less likely to add her knowledge or have that conversation, for fear of reprisal.
And then imagine this decision playing out in the minds of thousands of would-be contributors in other countries. That represents a loss for everyone who uses Wikipedia and the Internet — not just fellow editors, but hundreds of millions of readers in the United States and around the world.”

So far, the U.S. Department of Justice has little to say. A spokeswoman, Nicole Navas, said via email that the department is “reviewing the complaint,” but did not elaborate.

This kind of lawsuit by a major online player–if it manages to get traction–could have a dramatic impact on the future of free speech on the Internet, as well as the future of the NSA’s spying efforts here in America.

If anything, it reveals just how impactful Edward Snowden’s leaks have been–and how willing the American people are to stand up to government intrusions of freedom.
sorry, got cut off there.



When Comey, the director of the FBI decided not to charge Hillary Clinton, it looks like it had more to do with money than...