Thursday, April 27, 2017


by -

The scandal over Hillary’s email server is expanding to a private contractor who deleted emails, but did Hillary’s lawyers demand it?

When Hillary decided to use her home server it opened a huge can of worms that is exploding on her campaign right now.

New evidence now points to a private contractor who deleted thousands of emails for the Clinton campaign, but were they pressured by Clinton’s lawyers?

There are serious allegations of obstruction of justice and this timeline might help you understand.

3/2/2015 – The New York Times breaks the story that Hillary Clinton used her own private and unsecure email server when Secretary of State.

3/4/2015 – Congress issued a subpoena and preservation order for all of the email documents and by law Hillary must preserve everything on her server.

3/9/2015 – IT firm that was managing Clinton’s server is told to retain all the emails from Hillary’s server.

3/25/2015 – Clinton’s lawyers and legal team conducts a conference call with the IT firm.

3/31/2015 – Less than a week after the call with the lawyers and three weeks after being told to preserve all the data, the IT firm deletes the Clinton email archive.

They didn’t just delete the archive, they used a sophisticated program that scrubs all evidence and deletes any record permanently.

It is clear that the IT firm listened to Hillary’s team and not the government and they could be in big trouble.

Hillary’s legal team could be in big trouble too if they pressured or paid the IT firm to delete the files.

There is a real case of obstruction of justice here and most likely somebody is going to go down for this crime. There will be a fall guy or gal because we know for sure Hillary will weasel her way out of this like the FBI investigation.

Do you think that Hillary should be charged with obstruction of justice? Let us know in the comments below.

by -

Hillary has lied again and her latest scandal is now in full swing after this scandal started when she blamed Colin Powell for the last scandal. It is all confusing.

Hillary tried to get out of her email issues with the State Department by saying that Colin Powell told her to do it.

Colin admitted at first that he sent a memo describing how using his own AOL email for unclassified items sped up efficiency at the State Department.

A statement that he still stands by, but now he is tired of being blamed for her mistakes and lets us know when he sent the memo to Hillary.

“The truth is, she was using it (home email server) for a year before I sent her a memo telling her what I did. Her people have been trying to pin it on me.”

Powell admits he sent the memo, but it was after a year of her using her own home server.

Clinton also sent and received classified documents through her personal email, and that is something the Colin Powell did not do.

When asked why Hillary would lie about what Colin said and when he said it, he replied, “Why do you think? It doesn’t bother me. But it’s okay; I’m free.”

It might have to do with the presidential election, that’s our guess.

Hillary needs someone to blame when she does interviews for CNN and MSNBC so her followers will have something to believe.

It is obvious that she is lying again. She really has a problem with lying.

If Hillary is willing to lie her way to this point, what makes you think she will stop now?

by -

It is without a doubt that this election is one of the most unique and historical elections in our nation’s history, and a new scandal has things making a turn for crazy.

Hillary is moving from one email scandal to another. This time, it was the DNC that was hacked and 20,000 emails released to the public through Wikileaks.

Gucifer 2.0, believed to be a Russian hacker, released stolen emails that outline how the Democratic National Committee conspired to make Hillary the nominee and their plans to end Bernie’s campaign.

Email that suggested they attack Bernie’s religion for a two point boost.

The emails released show a DNC that cheated one of their own candidates in favor for Hillary, but it gets worse.

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz was the head of the DNC but she was forced to resign on Sunday in the backlash of the released emails. She will not be able to attend the convention and is going to have a hard time finding a job, right? Nope!

Just hours after the corrupt and biased head of the DNC resigned, guess who hired her? That’s right, Hillary Clinton.

Hillary took the opportunity to hire Wasserman-Schultz as a top campaign official.

We can’t make this stuff up. If Bernie fans were mad before, they are furious now. Thousands of Bernie fans and Hillary protestors have descended on Philadelphia for the convention and they are already shouting, “Lock her up”.

When Hillary hires a corrupt official the same day they resign, it doesn’t help her in the eyes of America. Ironically a CNN poll was released on the same day that reported only 30% of Americans think that Hillary is “trustworthy”.

The Director of the FBI, Mr. James Comey, called Hillary “extremely careless”, and although no criminal charges where placed on Hillary after the FBI investigation, it is clear she was reckless and put our country in danger.

Bernie Sanders himself wasn’t shocked to hear of the DNC conspiracy to defeat Bernie, but disappointed. Apparently he is still endorsing Hillary.

Bernie’s fans on the other hand are a little more upset. Watch protestors in Philadelphia on Sunday talk about their “feelings” for Hillary.

It is unbelievable that Hillary would hire Debbie Wasserman-Schultz on the day she resigns for leading a corrupt Democratic Party and people are starting to see through lies.

Hillary took a hit in the polls during her FBI email scandal, and now her convention is marred in corruption. If she keeps making decisions like hiring embarrassed and corrupt party leaders then she is just going to hand Donald Trump the presidency. That is unless she cheats.

What do you think of Hillary’s decision to hire Debbie Wasserman-Schultz? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
fox news

Roger Ailes is the man that is credited for building Fox News out of nothing and turning it into the most dominate cable news channel. After over two decades of transforming cable news, Roger is out!

That’s right, the Chairman and CEO of Fox News has stepped down and will no longer have any formal involvement in Fox News or it’s sister station, Fox Business.

It took Roger Ailes over 20 years to make it to the top and it took a sexual harassment claim and less than a month to force him to resign.

Rupert Murdoch, owner of 21st Century Fox, the parent company of Fox News, will step in as the Chairman and CEO until they can find someone to fill the giant shoes that Roger is leaving.

Roger’s contract was going to be up in 2018, and it has been reported that his settlement will be a minimum of $40 million.

What does his exit mean? Well, we are not sure yet.

50 anchors said they would leave if Ailes was forced out, but they didn’t say what they would do if Ailes resigned.

This news is fresh and Murdoch was wise to announce it on the same day that the Republican Convention and Donald Trump would dominate the news.

It was lost in the news cycle and for good reason.

Ailes’ departure will cause major ripples through the network and all of cable news.

Keep checking back to see what the fallout is over Ailes’ departure and let us know your thoughts in the comments below

by -

FBI Director James Comey didn’t indict Hillary Clinton, but he confirmed that she is a liar. But is there more? Yes, there is a lot more according to an anonymous FBI source who says Hillary and Bill Clinton are part of the biggest scandal of all time.

It all started on July 2nd when a person claiming to be an FBI agent went on 4chan (an internet chat forum) and started releasing chilling information into the Hillary email case and haunting revelations about the Clinton Foundation.

What is remarkable about this secret “FBI” informant is that after one week of hearing the responses from Lynch, Comey and even Obama about Hillary’s email server, the informant seems to be right on the money.

The knowledge that he shared about Hillary’s emails were made public the following week when Comey made his recommendation to the public on July 5th.

The informant said that Hillary had SAP level programs on her server. It turns out Director Comey admitted the same thing last week.

There seems to be a good amount of credibility from the informant, but he said the email server is not the story. He said they found out about the server while investigating Benghazi, then once on the server, they found out that the Clinton Foundation is beyond criminal to the line of treasonous.

Apparently, the Clinton Foundation is at the center of a buffet of scandals. The informant claims that the Clinton Foundation is involved with the illegal Saudi Arabia donations, the Russian uranium scandal, and more. He says that America faces three choices.

“I will put it to you this way: You have three choices,

A) turn over all of the information to the DOJ, make public a recommendation, the truth comes out, the entire world realizes how much the US is meddling in foreign affairs and we go to war, the civilian population realizes how much foreign money influences our government, and a civil war begins.

B) You cherry-pick the data to implicate the people already in the eye of public opinion, so the chips fall on the heads of a select few and the whole system does not crash.

C) you do nothing and watch the unstable political climate to gauge how you will respond.

I am confident if Trump wins she will be going to jail.”

The last line is very interesting. He says that he heard rumors that Trump will win and that he will pick Chris Christie as his Attorney General and Michael Flynn will be his VP.

The depth of corruption is overwhelming and everyone in the government is involved. Even Trump is said to be involved.

Although the informant said that Trump made donations to the Clinton Foundation in order to get some building permits, but he was clever and won’t be convicted.

He also went on to say that Trump and Russia both have information on Hillary that will help bring her down, and Trump is going to release his information soon. He continued saying that the Russians have hacked Hillary’s server as well and are considering releasing all of the documents to the public.

This treasure trove of information could be coming from some guy in his underwear claiming to be an FBI agent in-between episodes of “24”. Or this guy could be the real deal: frustrated FBI agent who wants to keep his job, but also wants the world to know what is really going on.

Only time will tell if this informant on an Internet chat forum is real, but if Trump or Russia release stolen Hillary documents soon, this guy could be telling the truth.

See the entire discussion here.

Do you think the FBI informant is real? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
Panama Papers

Hillary Clinton has done her best to divert attention of what happened in Benghazi and her email server and continues to lead the Democratic nomination for President, but her Panama connection could make it all crumble.

What are the Panama Papers? Last week, Mossak Fonseca were the victims of a major leak of confidential information that is larger than the Snowden leaks.

Mossak Fonseca is a law firm in Panama that offers “comprehensive legal and trust services” according to their website. A well-known newspaper in Germany got a call from someone with over 11.5 million documents and wanted to hand them over free of charge. The person simply said “I want to make these crimes public”, and they certainly did.

Basically the files contain secrets from some world leaders and people in high political places that have stashed money in “tax havens” around the world to avoid paying taxes in their own country, but that is just scratching there surface. What has happened so far?

Well, the Prime Minister of Iceland quit shortly after the release. David Cameron, the British Prime Minister, was on the list and his approval rating has dropped, and we are just starting to see the fallout in the UK.

People like Vladamir Putin were on the list, and some very interesting facts came out when looking closer to Russia in the Panama Papers and how it all relates to Hillary Clinton.

One of Russia’s biggest banks uses The Podesta Group to lobby for them inside the United States. Tony and John Podesta started the company, and you may remember John from being Bill Clinton’s chief of staff. The Podesta Group offers its clients access to the real Democratic decision makers. They have real access.

The unique access to the power structure of Democrats in Washington is exactly why the Russian bank used the lobbying firm. The people listed to handle the Russian Bank’s lobbying on behalf of The Podesta Group are Tony Podesta, Stephen Rademaker and David Adams.

Stephen and David were former assistant secretaries of state and Tony Podesta has organized a lot of those high dollar donations for Hillary Clinton that Bernie Sanders is always talking about.

Now here is the kicker. John Podesta has unique access to Hillary Clinton. Why? He is her campaign manager. He is the one building the strategy to get her in the White House. The same guy whose brother and company is lobbying for Russia to cut some of the sanctions after the country invaded Ukraine.
This is unparalleled access and it is just the tip of the iceberg. The person who is leading the Democratic nomination for president has her chief of staff also running a company that is working for Russia as a lobbyist.

The whole story is just starting to come out and Hillary’s future may not rest in the FBI with the email scandal, but in a bunch of leaked documents from Panama.

by -
hillary clinton oops

Hillary Clinton thinks the United States should act a little more like the scandal-plagued, economically-collapsing pseudo-democracies of Latin America.

According to Jennifer Epstein, a Bloomberg Politics correspondent embedded with the Hillary Clinton campaign, Hillary made the comment during her speech at the Atlantic Council:

“Probably predictable for me to say this,” she said, “but there’s a lot we can learn from Latin America’s success in electing women presidents.”

While Latin America has elected three female presidents in its history—all of them currently in office—they’re not exactly the shining example Clinton thinks they are. And certainly not the kind of leader a U.S. President—or, really, any world leader—should want to emulate.

In fact, in each case, their administrations have been ravaged by scandal and faced with collapsing economies.

Brazil’s Dilma Rousseff, for instance, is currently sinking underneath a growing corruption scandal—one that has seen 50 politicians from 6 different political parties implicated. For her role in the scandal, and the current state of the country, she’s been threatened with impeachment by high-powered former allies in Brazil’s National Congress—just seven months into her second term.

Worse, the once fast-developing Brazilian economy has skidded into a brutal recession under her leadership, with skyrocketing unemployment and a crumbling currency.

In Argentina, the situation is just as bad: President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, who succeeded her late husband as president, has seen her popularity plummet. After creating a mess of socialist regulations that have spooked investors and caused wild inflation in the once-wealthy South American country, Argentina’s economy has sputtered, and the nation has literally gone bankrupt: it defaulted on its debts and has been shut out of international lending markets.

Last month, the term-limited Kirchner’s self-chosen successor lost a once sure-thing election in a conservative upset victory. Argentina’s new incoming president, Mauricio Macri, has vowed to undo just about everything Kirchner created.

The day after he was elected, the Argentine stock exchange shot up more than 40%—largely driven by foreign investors who finally see a reason to invest in Argentina.

Meanwhile, in Chile, President Michele Bachelet has a pathetic 24% approval rating—due in large part to a massive scandal that involved her son and daughter-in-law pocketing a $5 million profit, after receiving a bribe from a major Chilean banker.

Bachelet also had to shuffle her cabinet after growing scandal just 4 months into her first term, and weathered disastrous public relations moves after another, where thousands accused her of exploiting a tragedy.

Hillary Clinton styles herself as a progressive—but if the “progress” she’s hoping for looks anything like the “progress” in South America, the United States could be in for a rough four years.

by -
Harry Reid Retirement Scandal

You’d never know it from the mainstream media puff pieces of Harry Reid’s sudden retirement, but it was a long string of corruption scandals—including a recent one involving his attorney son—that drove the veteran Nevada senator to abruptly leave public office.

For nearly a decade Judicial Watch has investigated and exposed Reid’s involvement in a multitude of transgressions and JW even warned the Senate Ethics Committee, but not surprisingly, no action was ever taken. On multiple occasions the Senate minority leader appeared on JW’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” list for his role in a number of political scandals that got more serious as his seniority and clout in Congress increased.

As far back as 2006 Reid was in hot water for violating Senate rules by concealing a seven-figure payoff on a suspicious land deal orchestrated by a longtime friend known for political bribery and mob ties. The influential senator secretly collected a $1.1 million profit on land he hadn’t personally owned for years. To hide the deal, Reid transferred ownership, legal liability and tax consequences to a company owned by a former casino lawyer who has been investigated by federal authorities. Months earlier Red got busted for accepting gifts from a state agency trying to influence him. In that scheme the lawmaker quietly took very expensive ringside boxing tickets from the Nevada Athletic Commission while that state agency was trying to influence him on the sport’s federal regulation.

In 2012 Reid made JW’s corrupt politician list because he was embroiled in an influence-peddling scandal involving a Chinese “green energy” client of a Nevada law firm run by his son Rory. The senator was one of the Nevada projects most prominent advocates, helping recruit the company during a 2011 trip to China and applying his political muscle on its behalf, according to a mainstream news report. Reid’s son was an attorney at the prominent Las Vegas firm that represented the Chinese Company, ENN Energy Group, and helped it locate a 9,000-acre desert site for well below its appraised value from Clark County.

In 2013 Reid was again named to JW’s most corrupt politician list for taking more than $130,000 in illegal campaign funds from a shady donor, Harvey Whittemore, who eventually went to jail. Whittemore hired four of the senator’s sons at a law firm in which he served as senior partner and worked with Reid on huge land deals that required federal legislation. Additionally, Reid sponsored at least $47 million in earmarks that directly benefitted organizations with close ties to one of his sons, Key Reid. The legislator also colluded with President Obama to nix a proposed nuclear waste dump in Yucca Mountain Nevada after U.S. taxpayers spent $15 billion on the project.

More recently Reid abused his authority to pressure the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to expedite a $115 million foreign investor visa deal critical to his son’s casino client. Reid got the DHS to override agency procedures to rush through hundreds of visa applications from foreign nationals who helped fund a Las Vegas hotel and casino that hired Rory Reid to provide legal representation for the project, according to a recent news report. The article goes into tremendous detail about the illicit scheme that evidently served as the straw that broke the camel’s back. A few days later Reid said he wouldn’t run for a sixth term in the Senate. His hometown newspaper called it a “surprise announcement.” On his government website, Reid posted a goodbye video saying he did his best though hasn’t been perfect.

by -
Hillary Benghazi Scandal

From Judicial Watch President, Tom Fitton:

Contrary to what the Obama administration had initially claimed in its public comments, top U.S. diplomatic officials knew the U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya, was under terrorist attack on September 11, 2012. This is big. In testimony before the U.S. House Oversight Committee on October 10, 2012, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Charles Lamb let the cat out of the bag. Apparently, the agents within the Diplomatic Security Commander Center in Washington, D.C., knew that U.S. embassy personnel were under a terrorist attack from the moment it began.

Mr. Lamb told the congressional committee the Command Center knew in “real time” that a coordinated terrorist attack was underway against U.S. facilities in Benghazi. Moreover, it was clear to top officials within the Commander Center that the attack had no relationship to a controversial video. But this is not what U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice said during an appearance on NBC’s Meet the Press program on September 16, 2011. The Benghazi attack was “almost a copycat” of spontaneous demonstrations that erupted against U.S. facilities in Cairo, Egypt, in response to the video,” Rice said on the program. But her scenario is in conflict with Lamb’s testimony.

“When the attack began,” Lamb testified, “a diplomatic security agent working in the Tactical Operations Center immediately activated the Imminent Danger Notification System and made an emergency announcement over the PA. Based on our security protocols he also alerted the annex U.S. quick reaction security team stationed nearby, Libyan 17th February Brigade, Embassy Tripoli, and the Diplomatic Security Command Center in Washington. From that point on, I could follow what was happening in almost real-time.”

There is good reason to have faith in Lamb’s testimony. That’s because there was an October 9, 2012, press conference call in which a senior State Department official told reporters “The ambassador walked guests out at 8:30 or so; there was nobody on the street. Then at 9:40 they saw on the security cameras that there were armed men invading the compound.” What this means is that we have now entered the fourth year of a cover-up that demonstrates the Command Center knew a full-fledged terrorist attack was underway almost from the instant it began. Documents from the Command Center could help to further unravel information the administration has sought to conceal.

All this is why Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the U.S. State Department last October.  Thanks to a court order in this lawsuit, the State Department finally started disgorging documents – the first batch of which arrived earlier this week (on January 20).

Despite knowing it was an attack, the State Department, including its Security Command Center, continued to falsely tie “demonstrations” to the Benghazi terrorist assault.  The State Department’s January 20 document production contains a press release issued by the Diplomatic Security Command Center, on September 12, 2012, that falsely states that “violent demonstrations took place at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, Egypt, and at the U.S. Special Mission Compound in Benghazi, Libya, resulting in damages in both locations and casualties in Benghazi.”

By the way, I’m not aware of the State Department telling Congress or anyone else about another “security” cover-up we uncovered, which is that there was no licensed security force at the Benghazi special mission compound on the day of the attack.  We found those documents in another FOIA lawsuit.

We have now filed 40 FOIA requests, a Mandatory Declassification Review and eight lawsuits against the Obama administration relating to the Benghazi terrorist attack. We are the only non-governmental organization currently litigating in federal court to uncover information withheld by the administration about the events that transpired before, during and after the assault on our fellow citizens in Benghazi.

The House created a Select Committee on Benghazi as the direct result of Judicial Watch’s uncovering emails showing White House orchestration of the knowingly false narrative that the Benghazi attack was due to an Internet video and spontaneous protests. The documents were obtained through a federal court order obtained by Judicial Watch in a separate FOIA lawsuit. Exclusive disclosures by Judicial Watch include photos of the Benghazi compound attack aftermath; various records about security contracts and gaps; documents related to administration’s efforts to lie to Congress and the American people about the attack; and emails with specific reports the State Department was receiving as the attack was taking place (including a State Department email detailing intelligence that Ambassador Stevens may have been alive at a Benghazi hospital).

Judicial Watch also produced an exclusive investigative news story questioning the handling of the Benghazi investigation by outgoing House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rodgers (R-MI).

In the meantime, I understand that the Select Committee on Benghazi held its third hearing (after nine months of operation) on, among other things, why the State Department is ignoring its document requests.  “Ugh,” you might say.  Just so you know, that hearing was secret.  “Double ugh,” you may also say.  Don’t worry; we will continue our lawsuits and investigations.  Your Judicial Watch will continue to be the best available means to hold the Obama administration (and corrupt alumnae such as Hillary Clinton) accountable for the Benghazi outrage.


by -
VS Scandal

When Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) physician Dr. Katherine Mitchell filed a confidential complaint in September 2013 with the office of Arizona Sen. John McCain about the wait time’s veterans were experiencing at a Phoenix VA hospital, little did she know what would happen next.

Her “confidential” complaint was routed in error to the VA’s Inspector General’s office that immediately placed her on administrative leave pending an investigation.

Her complaint?

Someone in Phoenix was cooking the books to make wait times for veterans needing doctor appointments seem far less than they really were – all in order to create the fiction that veterans were getting appointment times within the two to four-week period called for in VA guidelines.

Schedulers within the Phoenix VA Health Care System were keeping two sets of records to conceal prolonged patient waits for appointments and treatment. One set showed the real wait times that veterans were experiencing (four months or more) and one for auditors that showed three to four weeks – a sharp decrease in wait times for care.

It seems that once a doctor’s visit could be scheduled inside the “two to four-week window”, veterans were moved from the real wait list to the phony wait list to improve the wait time numbers. As a reward, VA employees were given cash bonuses and other benefits from VA administrators.

An examination of an e-mail exchange among employees at the Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center in Phoenix had program analyst Damian Reese complaining that administrators were cheering their “Wildly Important Goals” program as a success because it showed a dramatic reduction in wait times for patient appointments.

According to Reese:

“I think it’s unfair to call any of this a success when veterans are waiting six weeks on an electronic waiting list before they’re called to schedule their first PCP (primary-care provider) appointment,” “Sure, when their appointment was created, (it) can be 14 days out, but we’re making them wait 6-20 weeks to create that appointment. That is unethical and a disservice to our veterans.”

One whistleblower alleged that at least 40 veterans died while waiting for care on the secret list. The investigation final report showed that of the 93 VA facilities reviewed, three fourths had engaged in the deceptive scheduling to improve wait time statistics in order to receive cash bonuses.

The VA has cancelled the cash bonus incentive program – or has it.

In a piece for January 12 issue of The Washington Times, Jacqueline Klimas reports that:

“The Philadelphia VA announced a new incentive program earlier this month that rewards employees with cash and food for deciding cases quickly — a move that some employees say will encourage staff to rush claims and reject deserving applicants, once again leaving veterans struggling for benefits.”

Two days later, Klimas updated her report. According to Klimas:

“The Philadelphia VA regional office abruptly canceled plans Wednesday to pay bonuses for speeding up claims processing, after employees said they feared the bonuses would encourage them to make hasty decisions and deny deserving veterans their rightful benefits. The bonus program…offered $15,000 bonuses to teams that met processing targets and offered breakfast, lunch or snacks to teams that processed the most claims.”

Ms. Diana Rubens, director of the Veterans Affairs regional office in Philadelphia, wrote employees on Wednesday that the program was “rescinded, effective immediately.”


Listening to liberal college administrators waxing poetic from their ivory towers, one might conclude the greatest threat to higher education is not helicopter parents...