Tuesday, January 24, 2017

WikiLeaks

by -

A week after President Obama expelled Russian diplomats from the United States over alleged, yet unproven hacking of John Podesta’s email account, Maryland Democrat Sen. Ben Cardin is pushing for sanctions against the former Soviet Union.

Cardin, who is the leading Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relation’s Committee is pushing for sanctions due to Russia’s meddling in the Ukraine and their support for the Assad regime in Syria.

Arguably, the Kremlin, led by Vladimir Putin has engaged in the same level of meddling in foreign affairs as the United States in recent years as neither nation has developed an understanding of Jeffersonian, non-interventionist policies.

Cardin’s proposal will be a “comprehensive bill that will provide congressional authorization for additional sanctions against Russia.”

Comment below.

by -

A recent commenter on Liberty News Now explained that “all intelligence agencies agree, and that never happens!”

It has happened in the past during the lead up to the war and Iraq and the false and persistent claims that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction.

Last week, President Obama expelled Russian diplomats on 72-hour notice and within the last 48 hours, has deployed special forces troops to the Russian border.

Barack Obama’s main excuse for his behavior is the agreement of U.S. intelligence agencies in their assessment that the Kremlin “hacked” the Presidential Elections.

No proof has been made public to support the claim.

The main individual releasing the hacked data throughout the election was former hacker Julian Assange through the organization, WikiLeaks.

Assange has stated on numerous occasions that the source of the leaks emails from John Podesta’s gmail account were not from Russian sources.

President Elect Trump repeated those words in a tweet this morning saying:

The President Elect was scheduled to receive a security briefing to explain the alleged hacking on Wednesday, however, intelligence officials have delayed the briefing until Friday, setting off Donald Trump once again:

Vladimir Putin, the President of the Russian Federation, has refused to retaliate against the actions of Barack Obama, however, that was before the lame duck president deployed troops to the area, escalating tensions.

Comment below.

by -

U.S. Officials are reporting that 35 Russian diplomats have been given 72 hour notice that they are expelled from the United States.

Early reports show that the Russian diplomats were located in Washington, D.C., San Francisco, New York and Maryland.

Two diplomatic “compounds” were also said to be “shut down” in New York and Maryland.

The expulsion comes on the heels of President Obama’s promise to take action for alleged Russian hacking during the 2016 presidential election.

While the Obama Administration and his CIA reported that they have proof of hacking by the Russian government, no evidence has been released to the public.

As with many government operations, the public has been left to trust the reports of the Obama administration with no evidence.

According to the Russian government, the Russian Federation maintains Consular Offices in five cities around the United States: New York, Washington, D.C., San Francisco, Seattle and Houston, Texas.

The Russian Consular Office in Houston was contacted to inquire if that office has been shut down as well and no response has been received as of this report.

by -
Has Julian Assange gone missing after the 2016 Election

Ever since Julian Assange’s Internet was cut over a month ago, rumors started flying that he was taken, abducted, or worse.

During the month of October, WikiLeaks was the most used term in the media. The releases of the Podesta, Hillary and the DNC emails were earth shattering to the Clinton campaign and arguably contributed to her loss.

In late October, Assange’s Internet was cut in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, but did something else happen to him?

At the time, many loyal supporters thought he was taken and WikiLeaks was compromised, but now, weeks after the election, more and more people are starting to think that might be the case.

It is true that all the interviews and videos of Assange that have been seen over the last month were all pre-recorded and none talked about current events.

Groups like Anonymous and Infowars are assuming the worst.

See the video below from an Anonymous YouTube channel that provides the details surrounding this unusual case.

If something has happened to Julian Assange and WikiLeaks, there is no evidence to prove it just yet.

Is it as extreme as Alex Jones claims or is Assange just taking some time away from the media and enjoying being disconnected with the Internet.

Now even WikiLeaks has asked the public to stop asking for proof of life.

There is simply not enough information to know what has happened to Julian.

The Ecuadorian embassy could end the speculation by giving Assange his Internet right back or letting him come to his window.

There is more to this story, and as information that can be verified comes out, we will let you know.

Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

by -
wikileaks

The most used term online when discussing politics in October was the word WikiLeaks, but now the election is over, they’re far from done.

WikiLeaks was on the side of truth during the election, but that also benefited Donald Trump.

Now that Trump has won, thanks to Assange and his team constantly releasing damming emails from Hillary’s campaign, what can we expect next?

With a coming Trump presidency, it looks like Assange’s freedom could be restored.

On Monday, Sweedish officials are interviewing Assange in London, and taking his statement on the alleged crimes. Swedish officials have not given Assange the opportunity to give a statement in six years. Finally they are listening.

A live feed was available from outside the Ecuadorean Embassy in London where Assange has been living for the last four years.

A large crowd gathered outside the embassy and held signs that said FREE ASSANGE.

Julian Assange has become a “people’s” hero for releasing private documents from politicians and exposing corruption.

World leaders think of him a little differently.

Right now Trump is thanking his lucky stars for Julian Assange and WikiLeaks, but that could be different if WikiLeaks receives emails on Trump.

Thankfully WikiLeaks is not beholden to any party, just the truth and that is something we need in journalism.

Do you think authorities should release Julian Assange? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
russia
"Hillary Clinton" by Tim Pierce (licensed CC-BY-2.0)

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, had an interview where he spoke about the sources for Hillary’s emails and it isn’t Russia.

Hillary stood on the Debate stage and told the world that “17 intelligence agencies” have concluded that Russia is to blame for the hacks that has sent her campaign into a tailspin this year.

Every Democrat deflects the WikiLeaks questions by saying that Russia stole the information, but that doesn’t seem to be true.

The official statement from the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence have stated that Russia is the culprit, but are they?

Read the statement below and see that there is no evidence at all to confirm Russia’s involvement. The statement says that the methods of the hacking were “consistent” with Russian methods, but nothing concrete.

“The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.”

Not only did the intelligence agencies not confirm Russia’s involvement, they blamed Russia for something they may not be involved in.

If we listen to Julian Assange in his most recent interview, he says that Russia is not the source.

If Russia isn’t the source, then who is?

We don’t know for sure, but there are a lot of people who are saying that Seth Rich, the DNC staffer killed while walking home in DC is most likely the one who leaked the emails.

Lobbyists, WikiLeaks and others have offered a cash reward to information on Seth Rich’s death. The donated rewards are over $140,000 now. Some people believe that Seth Rich is the one that leaked it and they are willing to put their money where their mouth is.

The one thing we do know is that Russia has denied any involvement and we don’t have any evidence that they are to blame.

Democrats have done a good job in deflecting and trying to downplay the credibility of WikiLeaks, but the truth will come out. Unfortunately we won’t know until after this election.

Let us know if you think Russia hacked Hillary in the comments below.

by -
wikileaks

Emails, emails, emails… all we’ve heard about for over a year is Hillary’s emails, but now there is a easy way to read what is important.

WikiLeaks has released thousands of emails, and up until now all you could do was search through them by keyword and date and read them one by one.

Now there is a way that you can read the email for yourself and make up your own mind.

Hillary’s campaign Chairman John Podesta had his emails hacked and they have been leaked in 28 batches, almost one a day for a month.

The emails now have been displayed on Vaskal with headings and a brief explanation of the key emails.

There are literally hundreds of important and newsworthy emails but this page focuses on the top 100 or so.

If you have ever wanted to read the WikiLeaks emails, but were intimidated by the daunting task of searching through the thousands of emails to find relevant ones, then there is now a solution.

Click here to read the most important emails from the Podesta files.

If you don’t know much about WikiLeaks, this is a good video to understand how they grew to be one of the most influential organizations during this election.

WikiLeaks and Julian Assange offer a service to our country that isn’t provided by our media. That is evident in the corporate media’s attempts to discredit Assange and his releases.

It must also be mentioned that in over 10 years, WikiLeaks has not released any false documents.

Have you been following the WikiLeaks? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
assange

Over the past three weeks, Julian Assange has had his Internet cut, feared dead and recorded an interview to answer the questions, “Is Russia His Source?”

The founder of WikiLeaks has been living in the Ecuadorian embassy in London for over four years as he directs the actions of his whistleblowing site.

Recent leaks have caused the DNC chief to resign and exposed tactics that may have stolen the election from Bernie Sanders.

WikiLeaks also put Hillary’s campaign head, John Podesta’s emails out for everyone to read.

Hillary and her team of media surrogates have pushed the narrative that Russia is to blame for all of the hacks, but Assange is setting the record strait.

In a 25-minute interview with John Pilger from RT that airs Saturday, Julian Assange tells the world that Russia is not to blame.

“The Clinton camp has been able to project a neo-McCarthyist hysteria that Russia is responsible for everything. Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely; that 17 US intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That’s false – we can say that the Russian government is not the source.”

In a teaser released for the interview, Julian says that he feels bad for Hillary and we see a different side of Julian Assange.

The revelation that Russia is not behind the WikiLeaks would be a big one, but in all fairness it needs to be verified.

Hopefully, Assange will be able to give us more details to where the leaks came from, to fully vindicate the Russians.

If it turns out that Russia isn’t to blame, Hillary will look bad. A presidential candidate has been blaming the wrong country for crimes they may have not committed.

Make sure you tune in on Saturday to catch the Interview or check back with us as we update this ongoing groundbreaking story.

Do you think the Russians gave WikiLeaks emails? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
donna brazile
"Donna Brazile" by Tim Pierce (licensed CC-BY-2.0)

Donna Brazile has been caught red handed. She lied about giving Hillary debate questions and her CNN firing is the least of her problems.

A new email from WikiLeaks shows Donna Brazile, who worked at CNN at the time, receiving debate questions and passing them on to Hillary Clinton.

When the first evidence came to light through WikiLeaks in October, Donna Brazile denied that she gave Hillary a question. Even though the question in the email was exactly the one asked during the March 13th debate with Bernie Sanders.

See the exchange where Donna denies any wrongdoing in an interview with Megyn Kelly.

Just this week, WikiLeaks released a new email with Donna giving another question to the Hillary team.

This question was on the Flint water crisis and Hillary delivered a well-crafted answer.

WikiLeaks has a sterling reputation for authentic releases. There is no reason to believe that the documents have been tampered with or fake.

Donna on the other hand tried to deflect and play the victim in her interview with Megyn Kelly, but now she is in trouble.

On Monday Donna Brazile lost her job at CNN that was on hold while she is the interim leader of the DNC.

The DNC is under a lot of pressure to get rid of Donna, but they want to hold out to see if Hillary wins and then appoint a permanent leader. They may not be able to hold out for another week if more releases come out.

After Donna is replaced, and she will be replaced soon, where will she work?

Brazile has lost all credibility in the media. If CNN fired her then she is going to have a hard time working at any major network.

She violated the trust of the American people, of media and everyone in politics. Only Hillary’s team has any loyalty to her, but how long will that last if Trump wins?

Donna sacrificed her career to help Hillary cheat on a question. That is not very good judgment. Can you imagine if Donald Trump got a question early from Sean Hannity?

What do you think will happen to Donna Brazile? Let us know in the comments below.

by -
garner

Erica Garner is the daughter of a man that died after being choked by police and the most recent WikiLeaks emails has her angry.

In 2014 Eric Garner resisted arrest when he was allegedly caught selling cigarettes illegally. During the arrest he resisted and officer Daniel Pantaleo was recorded on video using a chokehold to subdue Mr. Garner.

Due to a previous condition, Mr. Garner died just moments later. The daughter of Eric Garner spoke out against his death and other black men killed by police. She protested with Black Lives Matter.

Now Erica Garner is back in the spotlight thanks to WikiLeaks.

A series of emails were released where the Clinton campaign spoke directly about how to use the death of Eric Garner to advance the Hillary Clinton agenda.

In the #Podesta19 release of WikiLeaks, the Hillary camp goes back and forth about how to use Eric Garner, and even calls Erica a “problem”.

Hillary’s press secretary and other staffers discussed using Eric Garner’s death, but he wasn’t killed by gun violence. He was killed by police violence and that didn’t quite fit into the narrative they were pushing on guns.

Basically they were trying not to make Erica mad while using her father’s death to go after guns.

Erica blasted the Hillary campaign and the DNC after the emails were released.

“I’m troubled by the revelation that you and this campaign actually discussed ‘using’ Eric Garner … Why would you want to ‘use my dad?”

It didn’t stop there and it isn’t stopping at all. After the Clinton minions on Twitter started firing back at Garner, she laid out the truth for them.

Erica Garner is not a pushover. She is a smart and intelligent woman that can’t be “played”. She is passionate about activism and “pissing” her off is the last thing the Hillary Clinton campaign needs right now.

Hillary needs black people to come out and vote for her or simply, she will not win in 10 days. Erica isn’t going to make it easy for Hillary though, and if Erica wasn’t before, she is a problem now.

When liberals got mad at Erica for going off on the Hillary camp online, they tried to remind her of Trump and how “scary” a Trump presidency would be. She had an answer to that too.

Erica gives it strait! Ironically she has a history going against the grain. A Project Veritas video recorded two years ago caught Erica talking about Al Sharpton and how he is “all about the money”.

Eric Garner’s tragic death should not be used to push political agendas, but that is what is happening and that is what Erica is speaking out against Hillary.

If her story isn’t suppressed, then Hillary is going to have a hard time to winning over black voters in the next 10 days.

What do you think about Erica Garner standing up for her father? Let us know in the comments below.

TRENDING STORIES

Bret Baier had egg on his face last night. The Fox News host of Special Report was scheduled to cover Project Veritas’s newest work at...